You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

I can understand leaning toward it being a LARP, because it can be quite frustrating reading the threads, like WHY CAN'T HE JUST TELL US?! Feels like being on a hook and getting pulled along. But it's equally plausible that he is doing it this way out of necessity. If he just straight-up tells us everything, it could be framed as RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA, and also simply releasing the info could cause a counter-reaction before they are ready to act. Remember Sun Tzu's Art of War. Trump doesn't want to broadcast his plans. Furthermore, some facts indicate that at the very least, the person making these threads has a high security clearance. The arrest of princes and the missile attack in Saudi Arabia is quite unusual and happens to coincide with Q-anon posts, and Saudi princes who were arrested have strong connections to the Deep State swamp (CIA, Clintons, Obama). Q raised the issue of how Trump was treated by the new King (vs. how Obama was treated) THREE DAYS BEFORE the arrests. The new King is a reformer and Trump has made an alliance with him. They are taking down the Wahabbists that fund terror operations (e.g. ISIS) on behalf of CIA. Q anon also gave coordinates yesterday that correspond to Manila, BEFORE it was announced that Air Force One will detour to Manila. And of course he predicted the indictment of Tony Podesta, which we haven't really confirmed, but at least some potentially trustworthy sources are saying he is under a sealed indictment. Q anon says Podesta used leverage to demand a media blackout concerning his arrest.

angelafogo ago

Yes but most of that information would be ready available to the enemy as well. And he could just advance what he already knows to fake authencity and then flood you with mumbo jumbo to keep you busy. Compare his messages to the other FBI anons. He does not sound right.

Millennial_Falcon ago

Yes but most of that information would be ready available to the enemy as well.

It's possible, but I lean toward authenticity.

Compare his messages to the other FBI anons. He does not sound right.

There was only one FBI anon. As for other "insider" anons, we don't know which ones are legit white-hats. Also, no reason to think one insider is going to sound like another. This is someone claiming to have the highest of the high security clearance. They have given very plausible reasons for the semi-cryptic nature of the posts. Again, not saying it is legit, but could be. Probably best to keep following to some degree, but not get too carried away. Q himself said it would all become clear, and that the point is for us to be ready to put the pieces together when info is released.