"Blood Libel" is a technical term. It designates well documented historical practices rooted in particular Talmudic and cabalistic believes, which alive and well till this very day.
The Rabbi's son Ariel Toaff who wrote about it as well as numerous others, and many others over 3,000 years agree. These stupid fuckers were sacrificing children to Moloch more than 2,000 years ago. But the disingenuous kikes and shills always pop up to argue verifiable facts with nothing but their worthless opinion and critical theory., These facts they do not want Publicly Known, evil bastards covering for this type of behaviour, they willfully cover for pedo's and murderers it is revolting..Spirit Cooking by jewess Marina Abramovitch and Skippys Pizza parties, to Talmudic gentile murder and blood letting its all connected by hooked snouts and rubbing hands.
It's a term used to describe the propoganda spread about the Jews during a specific historical period. And yes it's freaking hilarious that you guys use this term. lmao.
"Propaganda" ? No doubt you've spent many years studying unrelated accounts of jewish ritual murder and found them baseless, right?
Well, a Jewish-Italian scholar and historian, Ariel Toaff (himself son of the chief rabbi of Rome) begs to disagree with you. His books "Blood Passover" proves meticulously that various groups of Ashkenazi joos did actually steal and crucify christian children, and after draining their blood, used it for religious rituals. Toaff focuses in particular on the case of Simon of Trent. Simon was only 2-year-old when on the eve of Passover 1475, he was kidnapped by Ashkenazi Jews from his home in the Italian town of Trent. Simon was murdered, his body mutilated and crucified head down. Needless to say, Prof. Toaff was "crucified" himself by his fellow tribesmen and ADL. Yet, he lived to apologize, retract and republish a revised edition of his work.
This shill Lockherup, is just here to argue and deflect from the proofs posted here. He contributes nothing like the other mentally deficient shill Are We Sure, they are here to obfuscate and lie for their masters.
I know, you are the smartest mongrel in your yeshiva since you know many non-Yiddish words. But words a tribe has used to minimize or deny its crimes don't matter. What matters is the signified, not the signifier. To translate in a language you'd understand (using a dictionary): a murder of a child is a murder no matter how the murderer refers to it. Do you have a comment on the historicity of the human sacrifice practices described by Dr. Toaff? Was my comment over your head?
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we__sure ago
I think it's hilarious that you identify this as libel but believe it anyway.
ArmedExorcist ago
"Blood Libel" is a technical term. It designates well documented historical practices rooted in particular Talmudic and cabalistic believes, which alive and well till this very day.
SunWheel333 ago
The Rabbi's son Ariel Toaff who wrote about it as well as numerous others, and many others over 3,000 years agree. These stupid fuckers were sacrificing children to Moloch more than 2,000 years ago. But the disingenuous kikes and shills always pop up to argue verifiable facts with nothing but their worthless opinion and critical theory., These facts they do not want Publicly Known, evil bastards covering for this type of behaviour, they willfully cover for pedo's and murderers it is revolting..Spirit Cooking by jewess Marina Abramovitch and Skippys Pizza parties, to Talmudic gentile murder and blood letting its all connected by hooked snouts and rubbing hands.
lockherup ago
It's a term used to describe the propoganda spread about the Jews during a specific historical period. And yes it's freaking hilarious that you guys use this term. lmao.
ArmedExorcist ago
"Propaganda" ? No doubt you've spent many years studying unrelated accounts of jewish ritual murder and found them baseless, right? Well, a Jewish-Italian scholar and historian, Ariel Toaff (himself son of the chief rabbi of Rome) begs to disagree with you. His books "Blood Passover" proves meticulously that various groups of Ashkenazi joos did actually steal and crucify christian children, and after draining their blood, used it for religious rituals. Toaff focuses in particular on the case of Simon of Trent. Simon was only 2-year-old when on the eve of Passover 1475, he was kidnapped by Ashkenazi Jews from his home in the Italian town of Trent. Simon was murdered, his body mutilated and crucified head down. Needless to say, Prof. Toaff was "crucified" himself by his fellow tribesmen and ADL. Yet, he lived to apologize, retract and republish a revised edition of his work.
SunWheel333 ago
This shill Lockherup, is just here to argue and deflect from the proofs posted here. He contributes nothing like the other mentally deficient shill Are We Sure, they are here to obfuscate and lie for their masters.
lockherup ago
haha, do you even know what libel means?
ArmedExorcist ago
I know, you are the smartest mongrel in your yeshiva since you know many non-Yiddish words. But words a tribe has used to minimize or deny its crimes don't matter. What matters is the signified, not the signifier. To translate in a language you'd understand (using a dictionary): a murder of a child is a murder no matter how the murderer refers to it. Do you have a comment on the historicity of the human sacrifice practices described by Dr. Toaff? Was my comment over your head?
lockherup ago
yes it was. can you ELI5? thanks.