The Podestas and the "Abduction" of Madeleine McCann (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Millennial_Falcon

I never included this in the Executive Summary, because it just seemed too sensational and tenuous at the time, but given the solid "one-degree-of-separation" connection between the Podestas and Clement Freud (via Sara Latham), I want to post what I have.

I will start by mentioning the considerable evidence we have of the Podestas' involvement in child sexual abuse: Tony Podesta's art collection, the “pool party” email, Tony Podesta's “seated with the kids so I'm a little wired” email, the “pizza-related map handkerchief” email, the “torture chamber” email, the connections to Comet Pizza, Dennis Hastert, James Alefantis, and the Clintons, and the Breitbart tweet about Podesta being an “underage sex slave op cover-upper,” shortly before Breitbart's death, and over five years before Pizzagate emerged.

The Efits were supposed to be images of one man, but that story is dubious. They are too different. Also, it doesn't make sense that a private investigator would be able to find eyewitnesses that local police were unable to find. The Efits are likely an example of "parallel construction". That is, the investigator discovered the Podestas' involvement through some other means, and wanted to conceal those means and/or avoid directly accusing the Podestas. My guess would be that an inside source told the investigator the Podestas were behind the abduction, and the investigator then created the Efits, providing a fake story for their origin. This was perhaps the best way to protect himself and his source from retaliation (murder), while still leaking a strong hint. This seems likely, given other evidence implicating the Podestas.

Known pedophile Clement Freud has a villa 1/3 of a mile from where McCann was "abducted," and the McCanns even visited with Freud after the "abduction." There is at least one known connection between the Podestas and Clement Freud. John Podesta's Chief of Staff was Sara Latham, who had worked for Freud Communications, run by Freud's son.

John Podesta's emails are regular in frequency following May 4, 2007, whereas there is a 5-month gap that begins Nov. 1st, 2006 and ends May 4, 2007, the very day after McCann's abduction. Were those emails deleted to hide something? An assistant was handling Podesta's email at the time of the abuduction, indicating Podesta was on vacation.

The Efit images were suppressed for five years. Why?

Authorities in charge of the McCann case say they know who did it, but cannot arrest them due to international law. What kind of law would prevent authorities from requesting extradition? Diplomatic immunity. The authorities are telling us the people who did it are "untouchable." This certainly fits the Podestas, who are strongly tied into the Deep State of the world's only superpower, as well as the internationally influential billionaire George Soros. Any government that went after the Podestas would be inviting assassination or replacement through a CIA “dirty tricks” campaign. This includes the U.S. Government, as it is apparent the Deep State is using every possible means to try to take down Donald Trump before he can drain the swamp.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

Where does conman Kevin Halligen fit in? He was investigator who was hired by the McCanns and his company produced/supervised the e-fits

He was later convicted of fraud when it was found out he was lying about his background and skills.

There was a documentary made him called The McCanns and the Conman.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNm1zxF7Wg0

A conman who set up a firm to search for Madeleine McCann has denied he funded a lavish lifestyle using cash donated by the public.

Supporters of Kate and Gerry McCann handed over around £300,000 to Kevin Halligen's Washington-based company, but his contract was terminated early and he was later convicted of fraud in America on a separate matter. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/alleged-madeleine-mccann-con-man-3639040

He was not only a fraud known to rip off his clients (aka The McCanns and the people who donated to help them.) He was quite close to A LOBBYIST WHO COMPETED WITH TONY PODESTA.

Kevin Richard Halligen wasn’t the elite intelligence operative he claimed to be, but a charming and audacious con artist who lived a luxe lifestyle by fleecing others, including a number of lawyers, of millions, authorities say.

After he had already duped high-level contacts on the other side of the Atlantic, Halligen was introduced to society in Washington, D.C., in 2005 by a lobbyist and adviser to a well-known law firm which later did legal work for Halligen, the Washington Post (reg. req.) recounts in a lengthy weekend article.

Now the subject of a United States effort to extradite him from a London prison to face a felony fraud case, Halligen reportedly made millions through a network of intelligence community contacts he apparently tricked into believing that he had security expertise and connections that he lacked. In addition, courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia have found him liable for millions more that former partners say he defrauded them of.

Halligen also, seemingly, married an attorney working for the U.S. Commerce Department at a lavish 2007 ceremony at which the Patton Boggs lobbyist was his best man. However, the wedding was conducted by an actor, after Halligen told his bride-to-be at the last minute that he couldn’t sign any legal documents, according to the newspaper. It isn’t clear that he informed her he was already married.

A prominent lawyer who offered a toast at the wedding later won a Fairfax County judgment against Halligen for $5.7 million.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyers_say_they_lost_millions_to_con_artist_working_as_elite_security/

So we have a fraud who is an insider to the world of Washington lobbyists.

A possibility: If he was ripping off the McCann's, it stands to reason he might have faked actually doing the work. Instead of getting a real sketch artist, he had the efits created from pictures and since he was lying about the Witness, he made two efits of different people, so the cops wouldn't find anyone and then he gave details like the age that didn't match the pictures. And just as a special fuck you, he uses pictures of the competitors of a good friend. Fuck them.

Another possiblity. Lots of folks think the McCanns are guilty. Perhaps they worked with a conman to manufacture a new witness.

ReddittRefugee ago

A possibility: If he was ripping off the McCann's, it stands to reason he might have faked actually doing the work. Instead of getting a real sketch artist, he had the efits created from pictures and since he was lying about the Witness, he made two efits of different people, so the cops wouldn't find anyone and then he gave details like the age that didn't match the pictures. And just as a special fuck you, he uses pictures of the competitors of a good friend. Fuck them.

This is ridiculous speculation based on partial knowledge of the facts.

The e-fits were actually done by a person employed by Halligen and Oakley International, Henri Exton.

Halligen ripped off the McCanns, and didn't even do any work himself, apart from conning them.

However, Exton actually did go to Ireland and did the actual work of generating the e-fits with the witnesses in question, the Smith family.

Ha, ha, and like everybody else who got involved with Halligen, got ripped off (he was only paid partially for his work.)

What part of "the e-fits were generated independently in Ireland (not in Washington)" don't you understand?

http://fytton.blogspot.ca/2016/06/smiths-exton-sy-and-e-fits-part-two_4.html

Are_we_sure ago

This is ridiculous speculation based on partial knowledge of the facts.

I thought it was competent speculation based on partial knowledge of the facts. Because I haven't looked deeply into this.