I never included this in the Executive Summary, because it just seemed too sensational and tenuous at the time, but given the solid "one-degree-of-separation" connection between the Podestas and Clement Freud (via Sara Latham), I want to post what I have.
I will start by mentioning the considerable evidence we have of the Podestas' involvement in child sexual abuse: Tony Podesta's art collection, the “pool party” email, Tony Podesta's “seated with the kids so I'm a little wired” email, the “pizza-related map handkerchief” email, the “torture chamber” email, the connections to Comet Pizza, Dennis Hastert, James Alefantis, and the Clintons, and the Breitbart tweet about Podesta being an “underage sex slave op cover-upper,” shortly before Breitbart's death, and over five years before Pizzagate emerged.
The Efits were supposed to be images of one man, but that story is dubious. They are too different. Also, it doesn't make sense that a private investigator would be able to find eyewitnesses that local police were unable to find. The Efits are likely an example of "parallel construction". That is, the investigator discovered the Podestas' involvement through some other means, and wanted to conceal those means and/or avoid directly accusing the Podestas. My guess would be that an inside source told the investigator the Podestas were behind the abduction, and the investigator then created the Efits, providing a fake story for their origin. This was perhaps the best way to protect himself and his source from retaliation (murder), while still leaking a strong hint. This seems likely, given other evidence implicating the Podestas.
Known pedophile Clement Freud has a villa 1/3 of a mile from where McCann was "abducted," and the McCanns even visited with Freud after the "abduction." There is at least one known connection between the Podestas and Clement Freud. John Podesta's Chief of Staff was Sara Latham, who had worked for Freud Communications, run by Freud's son.
John Podesta's emails are regular in frequency following May 4, 2007, whereas there is a 5-month gap that begins Nov. 1st, 2006 and ends May 4, 2007, the very day after McCann's abduction. Were those emails deleted to hide something? An assistant was handling Podesta's email at the time of the abuduction, indicating Podesta was on vacation.
The Efit images were suppressed for five years. Why?
Authorities in charge of the McCann case say they know who did it, but cannot arrest them due to international law. What kind of law would prevent authorities from requesting extradition? Diplomatic immunity. The authorities are telling us the people who did it are "untouchable." This certainly fits the Podestas, who are strongly tied into the Deep State of the world's only superpower, as well as the internationally influential billionaire George Soros. Any government that went after the Podestas would be inviting assassination or replacement through a CIA “dirty tricks” campaign. This includes the U.S. Government, as it is apparent the Deep State is using every possible means to try to take down Donald Trump before he can drain the swamp.
view the rest of the comments →
dundundunnnnn ago
Didn't Clement Freud befriend the parent's after the disappearance? He invited them over for dinner. Smells fishy.
carmencita ago
Yes, he invited them for lunch I believe, and only a couple days after their daughter's kidnapping. Rather strange, I agree. I think it was very odd that they accepted as well. I think it is a well known fact that Praia del Luz is a place visited by many pedos and many live there as well. You would also think since Gerry had a computer, that they would have been able to research the place before they chose to holiday there with children. Yes Smells Very Fishy.
DerivaUK ago
Clement Freud had not yet been ‘outed’ as a paedophile. His proclivities were only revealed after his death. It is hugely significant that this little girl’s disappearance evoked not only the most rapid and immediate but also, and more importantly, unprecedented response and input from some of the highest echelons of the political, social, journalistic and corporate elite, Including Blair, Brown, Milliband, Freud Communications (owned by Clement’s Son) who appointed ex political spin doctor, Clarence Mitchell as the McCann’s press spokesman and the involvement of many, many more. I think Gerry McCann knew exactly what lay ahead in Praia de Luz. He’s already heard on film en route to their holiday complex grumpily stating that he wasn’t there for a holiday. His invitations to the Whitehouse in the ensuing months said it all for me.
carmencita ago
When I first came to voat there was something on the internet about how Gerry had CP on his computer and a police friend helped remove it from the computer. I can no longer find it. Yes, the visit to the WH and other pretty obvious key factors are pretty convincing that the McCanns are involved. Still I believe that that there were pedophiles living there. I believe that is one reason they went there. It mas been covered on here that a certain PM of the UK was also involved.
DerivaUK ago
Two; Tony Blair and later, Gordon Brown. I too have seen something regarding the removal of CP on McCanns computer - I think it may have featured in the video series on the McCanns by Richard Hall (Rich Planet on YouTube). He also nicely debunks the timings of the alleged ‘last’ photographs on Gerry McCann’s holiday camera. There is much Gerry MCann can’t explain away imo. Praia de Luz is a well known paedophile haunt.
carmencita ago
This article so very much incriminates Gerry McCann, It makes it so very obvious he is implicated. The piece about the crying child at the end was heartbreaking. The woman living above the MCanns really should be interviewed. So possibly they went out and let some pervert have his way with their child. Scums, both of them. She also had to know what he was doing. There is no way she is not guilty as well.
DerivaUK ago
Her first words on returning to the Tapas bar (and note, leaving her twins alone in the very apartment where her daughter has just been discovered missing!!): “They’ve taken her”. Who were “they”?
carmencita ago
Possibly the people they had rented her out to while they wee partying with their friends. The article you sent me that I mentioned, had one of their children crying for a whole hour while they were out. So this is a pattern, leaving their children with someone. With Gerry's CP on his computer we have to know that he is mixed up in some sexually abusive stuff. Possibly they were only renting her out, but had no idea that they had intentions of stealing her for someone. At least maybe Kate did not know, but Gerry did. Someone very important that always got what he wanted.
DerivaUK ago
There’s also somewhere a conversation with Gerry McCann and one of the Tapas group men where Gerry is asked “will she do this?” Whilst sticking a finger in his mouth and then circling a nipple with said finger. Those adults took turns to “check” on those children - and many of their stories about that night are conflictive. My opinion is that this was perhaps a kind of ‘mini pizzagate’ circle holiday and that other local paedo’s knew of this and paid visits to that holiday complex with a view (or an agreement - who knows) to partake in the activities of that little club. It’s a theory I’ve nursed for some time.
carmencita ago
I agree and maybe those two people named, where there that night and wanted to take someone home. He or they could not leave her behind. Gerry is a disgusting and vile pervert making such a sexual reference about any child, let alone his own.