You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Blacksmith21 ago

Lemme throw something out here to consider and debate:

Why is it only the last 10 years or so where we have seen an absolute flood of what could generally be considered "hot teachers" sleeping with their male students?

Now let me first say, I personally don't believe that a female can "rape" a male. There is a lot of physiology which goes into "rape" or "sexual assault", and having been a teenager once, I'm pretty confident that once a 16 yo boy gets horned up, there is no stopping him. Or stopping him from telling his friends. OR stopping any of his friends from attempting a turn at it.

What is causing this recent uptick in teachers screwing male students? Is this some side effect of social media? Is it "ambient MKU" - pharma, TV, internet-based mind control related programs? Is this "social engineering" in action? What happens when you add all of these environmental factors, plus the constant feed of sexual-related themes in all forms, at all ages - Elsa, Disney, TV, YT, Internet, sex education, teaching grade schoolers about homosexual gangbangs, etc.

Something is wrong with millennials and younger - society, entertainment, prescription drugs, etc. is having an effect on young women (who likely have manchildren has husbands). Houston we have a problem...

migratorypatterns ago

Social engineering.

And a woman not being to rape a male is not true. In the case of an "older" woman raping a child, it's even more doable. I think you're getting the word "rape" confused with "force". It's what Whoopie postulated with her Polanski defense of his rape not being "rape-rape". A teacher, coach, therapist are in unique positions. The child is "forced" to be in their territory and has to interact. The fact that the teacher probably groomed hm by inviting him back to her home for drinks ... being cool ... grooming him.

The law is there to protect sixteen-year-olds from being put in that position, but nonetheless, it happens. Look at the revelations about the U.S. gymnastic doctor that molested all those young girls. So t's not "rape" because he didn't force them down, pin them to the ground and rape them? Yeah, it is! And what you brought up is exactly why the law is in place. Adult women have no business grooming young boys. As for your question, I think it's partly social engineering and partly that The Cannibal Elite made it acceptable. It's only going to get worse if we allow these laws to change. They're trying everything they can and Jerry Brown & the sickos out there did "modernize" the Sex Offender Registry laws by allowing adult men and women convicted of possesssing child porn to BE DROPPED FROM THE REGISTRY AFTER 10 YEARS!!! In this case, they made up the bogus excuse it was interfering with police from finding REAL sex offenders. Excuse me Californication: THEY ARE REAL SEX OFFENDERS!!!

Blacksmith21 ago

It's a very grey area. I'm not advocating or condoning. All I am saying is that there is a bit of a double standard when it comes to female-on-male "sex crimes" within a reasonable age range. I'm talking about boys who 70 years ago would have gone off to war.

All that being said, I don't think the 'bar" needs to be lowered, because that's how it starts. First 18 was the bar, then 16, then... I get it.

I'm not saying that what any of the teachers did was right, as they had the power to shut it down and say "no" at any point. I am saying by the time the contact was physical, most teenage boys would need to be hit with a firehose to stand down.

migratorypatterns ago

I hear you, but that's no excuse for an adult to target a minor.

We don't really know anything about this story. When she met, how she groomed him, etc.

But I'm glad we see eye-to-eye on the "slippery slope" argument. We don't need to be lowering the age limit. Let me put it this way, it's there to protect the child IF grooming, alcohol, drugs, or force was used, and children should be protected.

Blacksmith21 ago

Yeah, we are seeing more or less, eye-to-eye. Things get a lot more complex, and damning, when you add intoxicants to the mix. Then it becomes pretty apparent that an adult is making an attempt to take advantage of a child.

migratorypatterns ago

Absolutely. I just made a comment about the "twink parties" thrown by Singer on another thread. It's what these teachers do. Invite a bunch of kids over and use liquor, etc. to drop their guard. The other thing is that these pedos are PREDATORS. Predators are well-practiced manipulators. They've done it before and will again. It's not like going out to a baseball game and meeting someone you think is attractive. This more like going to be baseball game and meeting SATAN!!! They know how to use psychology, flip the script, and get the victim to do what they want.

It's not the same as regular attraction. It just isn't.

Blacksmith21 ago

It's the behavior of a sociopath. I am very well acquainted with their traits Professional liars. More lies. Tell you whatever you want to hear. Masters of blame everyone else. It's your fault not theirs. Master of the circuitous argument.

Again...all I am saying is that if there is a hot 28 year old teacher (who is a predator), who invites a pair of 16 yo boys over to her house to party and make her airtight, I can assure you that the boys are generally very willing participants, unless there is something else - grades, blackmail, innuendo, etc - used to coerce. The predatory teacher knows this is the behavior of teenage boys and uses it to her advantage or to satifisy desires or feed her psychoses.

migratorypatterns ago

Understood.