Guess it's go big or go home!!! Loomer's been right so far so let's see if this proves true!!! It's nothing that wasn't speculated, but it was "debunked" on Voat by the people that think they're experts. NOT!!!
https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/923326398986620929
Source in intelligence telling me #LasVegasShooter #StephenPaddock may have used the $100k transfer to the Philippines to traffic children.
Now that the DEA wiretap came out, this doesn't sound so far-fetched!!!!
view the rest of the comments →
Sackajahweeda ago
So question and not that I am convinced either way as a there has been good evidence on her part and also I honestly believe that ALL ROADS LEAD TO PIZZA but b this seems awfully time convienent...what say you all about the timing of the brothers charges? Setup...or is he a db that needs exterminating? Asking for a friend
migratorypatterns ago
It's a good question. I'm sort of on the fence about that myself.
The most reasonable way to look at it is that Paddock was involved with child trafficking, and that if he were involve, undoubtedly the brother was, too. So perhaps the charge is a means to an end ... a truism in that he was in possession of CP, but that the arrest served a double purpose. The Paddocks don't look like the most dependable people on earth (understatement), so they could be afraid he'd talk .... or try to wring money out of them as blackmail (as if that was going to happen), or get a bigger cut, or move up into the position his brother held.
So all of the above, but my best guess is that the CP was real and that the Paddocks were dirty. It's why they were targeted and we can prove that statement true because of the wiretap the DEA took out on him. This was before anything in LV happened. Therefore, there was a loose end, they needed a false flag, and they got rid of Paddock (the loose end) and got their push for gun control.
karenrussell63 ago
listen to the full interview with his brother. eric says he was the youngest brother and basically that stephen is pretty much why him and they're mom are rich. he was talking about how he helped the few who were close to him. he said that his brother was smart enough to do whatever he wanted. he also said:
it's hard to know what he's saying here, but to me he's saying that while he believes his brother is capable of carrying out the shooting, thats not something his brother would ever do. he was hoping for a tumor to explain it but his autopsy didn't reveal anything.
what is he referring to when he says someone like steve? someone intelligent, or maybe someone trained?
why are we all in trouble if no tumor is found? is it because whatever kind of person steve was, there are others like him and might they do something similiar?
just questions for now.
migratorypatterns ago
Well, for one this guy isn't wrapped too tight so take everything with a grain of sand.
No way do I buy the innocent act. He knew, his brother knew, exactly what Stephen was into. You gotta remember that his dad was a scumbag so they're very used to lying covering for the "breadwinner". Think that's what he very inarticulately expressed. As for the tumor, if there were something like that to explain the crime spree, that POS brother could probably get a book and movie deal because "it wasn't his fault"! Yeah, that wouldn't explain why someone would get into trafficking children, and the allegations are out there. See how the loss of the hard drive helps this scumbag?
It's not always true, but in this case the apple didn't fall far from the tree.