https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Timothy+Charles+Holmseth+haleigh+cummings&view=detail&mid=754D3355A847A1F39F24754D3355A847A1F39F24&FORM=VIRE
This is related to PG in that the reporter being interviewed quotes Craig Sawyer 5:42
“They’re never going to be able to stop this epidemic…You know, with what they’re doing to children..They’re never going to be able to kick in enough doors..So what we need to do is to compromise their operations. What kind of operations? Satanic ones.
Can we have a dialogue about that here? the Weinstein “bone” that has been thrown has accomplished what they wanted: a redirection away from the organised operations that are kidnapping, raping, torturing and murdering children in service to what most people know as satan. (Please don't forget the spirit cooking crap)
We’ve got REAMS of circumstantial evidence to that fact, from this interview, to Dave McGowans “Programmed to Kill” and “weird scenes from the Canyon” that there is documented evidence for an argument of satanic infiltration. Satanism is by nature a secret society. Therefore it’s activities are going to be managed to conceal, redirect and downright lie (fake news, anyone?) people into moving away from the truth of their true purpose.
I would so love to see people that are atheist and agnostic just put aside their philosophical arguments long enough to realise that something about PG is real enough for them to repeat these behaviours for THOUSANDS of years. That’s right, I said it. So can we get to work on the only thing that matters: how to prevent these sickos continuing what they’re doing?
view the rest of the comments →
SoberSecondThought ago
I'm going to argue here for a sensible middle ground. Yes, you are correct that people of faith, people with spiritual values, are more likely to take this problem seriously. I think that's a statistical reality, just as it is a statistical reality that "blue" states are somewhat less church-going and less likely to volunteer or give to charity than "red" states are.
But I want to urge you -- all of you, not just OP -- to consider how your spiritual beliefs make you vulnerable to manipulation. Because they do. Back in the 1980s, the pedos exploited this vulnerability by playing up the Satanic abuse angle, rather than playing it down. The accusations quickly escalated far beyond what the evidence supported, dragging literally hundreds of daycares and kindergartens into prolonged scandals that led nowhere. The idea of Satanic abuse got discredited, which was a victory for them. And it got discredited in large part because of the excesses of sincerely spiritual people, who weren't good investigators, who didn't have anyone to impose rules of evidence, and who thereby got way ahead of the actual facts.
I agree that Voat's structure has some disadvantages. But this little community has developed some strong BS filters, and has stayed focused on real facts. (By that I mean, facts that will also qualify as facts to an atheist.) There won't be a repeat of the problems of the 1980s here.
I have something I am working on that will help address the scattered and repetitive way that subjects are addressed. Hopefully I can post it tomorrow. In the meantime, I would just say: Don't let v/pizzagate get divided along atheist/religious lines. We all need one another.
pizza-party-pooper ago
agreed