https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Timothy+Charles+Holmseth+haleigh+cummings&view=detail&mid=754D3355A847A1F39F24754D3355A847A1F39F24&FORM=VIRE
This is related to PG in that the reporter being interviewed quotes Craig Sawyer 5:42
“They’re never going to be able to stop this epidemic…You know, with what they’re doing to children..They’re never going to be able to kick in enough doors..So what we need to do is to compromise their operations. What kind of operations? Satanic ones.
Can we have a dialogue about that here? the Weinstein “bone” that has been thrown has accomplished what they wanted: a redirection away from the organised operations that are kidnapping, raping, torturing and murdering children in service to what most people know as satan. (Please don't forget the spirit cooking crap)
We’ve got REAMS of circumstantial evidence to that fact, from this interview, to Dave McGowans “Programmed to Kill” and “weird scenes from the Canyon” that there is documented evidence for an argument of satanic infiltration. Satanism is by nature a secret society. Therefore it’s activities are going to be managed to conceal, redirect and downright lie (fake news, anyone?) people into moving away from the truth of their true purpose.
I would so love to see people that are atheist and agnostic just put aside their philosophical arguments long enough to realise that something about PG is real enough for them to repeat these behaviours for THOUSANDS of years. That’s right, I said it. So can we get to work on the only thing that matters: how to prevent these sickos continuing what they’re doing?
view the rest of the comments →
carmencita ago
Also, I must say there is always something missing when we research a case, there is always a hanging thread that we just can't unravel. Whenever one of us finds something they categorize it as a Potential Lead or Clue. Who keeps track of this stuff. We should add it all together and see what we come up with. Also, if we do have some really important clues that add up and we have serious evidence, who do we take this to that we can trust (and I do not mean any of the YT Idols). I am really interested in hearing everyone's thoughts.
ESOTERICshade ago
The design of the voat software scatters things out and stops conversations about topics from going further. I don't think it is intentional it is just a byproduct of the design.
That does not happen in a forum that works on a bump system. On a bump system forum everytime somebody posts in a thread it bumps to the very top of the forum and everybody can see it. As new info comes in over time people use the same threads.
Ideas and subjects don't die off nearly as easily in a bump system and the info tends to stay in the same thread.
At Voat there are literally dozens of threads about the exact same subjects. I can't think of worse system to save information and keep a discussion on track. Its a train wreck for organizing information and keeping a particular aspects of a themed discussion alive.
For example there should really only be one Harvey Weinstein thread that everybody posts to. That thread/post would be active as long as information came in and it would all be together. As interest in it eventually died out it would stop rising to the top of the forum. If new info came in it would bump to the top of the forum because somebody posted something in it.
All the info would be together in just a couple of threads.
Voat's design is the opposite. It scatters info everywhere and kills topics. Not on purpose in my opinion, just an unfortunate side effect of the design.
2impendingdoom ago
Bump refers to cocaine, just so you know what the MSM is now saying about 4chan, it is where you can buy and sell drugs because of all the bumping over there.
ESOTERICshade ago
I didn't know that MSM was trying to equate a bump forum with cocaine. I knew cocaine and "bump" were affiliated but I didn't know about the MSM part. Not surprised though. Guess we have to come up with a new term.
2impendingdoom ago
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=1YIpi8GVbc8
cocaine and revenge porn. Anything they have to do to compromise the truth.