You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4_InquiringMinds ago

Hillary has pissed some higher ranking members off and is being sacrificed to the public/if indeed it actually happens.

At the same time (just posted earlier)...

As we play wag the Julian, here a year later still the debate/is he or isn't he fill in the blank. It's a game, one that we play willingly.

Right now thousands of children are being transported around the country (and other countries) for several high satanic festivals. We are not talking a few hundred children. We are also talking moving thousands of infants. When we should be scrutinizing all modes of transportation (to start) we are waiting like pavlov dogs for the next crumb from Julian. Think of the holding facilities that are needed for all the infants and children...all the cages etc/manpower to manage (care for) and move (transport). Food and water are needed bc while they don't care if the children die/they need to keep them alive long enough for the rituals. They would have a certain loss ratio that is acceptable but beyond that for the investment to 'pay off' a large percentage need to make it to the altars. Think of all the body disposal facilities that have to be lined up and ready/and processing the die off now that happens re the loss ratio. Think of all the organs that might be harvested bc why let a good ritual go to waste profit wise? Think of the transplant operations/if they are gearing up for an influx of organs. Think of cold storage materials that might be needed. I don't even know how far it goes...is there a sudden uptake in Styrofoam containers, dry ice (or whatever they use) and if so where are these shipments going to. These are the details that would give us clues. These would be ways to find the children who wait in cages languishing, waiting for hell on earth to come to them.

But instead we play over and over wag the Julian. I'm not trying to be unkind to your statement bc I played wag the Julian too. I also 'believed' bc I wanted to believe. That is the nature of bias and it is used against us most effectively.

peace~

migratorypatterns ago

Look, it's very nicely written but BS. Everybody's a critic and now they're criticizing and framing our actions under a derisive "catchy" label. I'm really sick of it. I listened to Heather Unruh who I never heard of before. I listened to Rose McGowan who I did hear of, but wasn't a particular fan. I listened to Kim Dotcom when he said he had contact with Seth Rich. I listened to Mike Cernovich who delivered some dishy dirt. I listened to Laura Loomer when she went to LV and pushed the timeline around due to her digging. I listened to an anonymous tweeter who said that at the age of ten, Roman Polanski took nude pics of her in a fur coat on the beach. I listened to Griffin O'Neal when he posted a pic of his dad and Polanski together on a dinner date and hinted that his family was into dark thing. I listened to Dylan Allen when she grew up and told her story to the world about the abuse she suffered at Woody Allen's hands. I listened to Corey Feldman who said Hollywood's #1 problem was pedophilia. I listened to many woman tell their horrendous experiences with Harvey Weinstein. And I listened to numerous indie news/media channels when they printed about the Awan brothers. I also listened to the members of Reddit before #pizzagate and then I moved and listened to the members here, none of whom I know or would recognize on the street. Am I making my point clear? If not, I will listen to fucking ANYBODY that tells the truth of what the hell is going on! I'm not a sycophant of Assange, nor does he control my movements. Rather, he's a prisoner of the people he told the truth about. Now he's living in an Ecuadorian embassy, and still he goes on TELLING THE TRUTH! Why? Because he's the one with the emails! He's the one with the sources! he's the one performs those dumps! So anybody else out there, if you want to tell the truth, I'll listen, and not because some two-bit critic who's too cool for school wants to make a name by declaring themselves the "ONLY" free thinker and independent person out there. I call BULLSHIT! When someone tries that long and that hard to prove themselves free from the shackles the rest of us wear, they're the biggest sucker of them all! After all, where would they be without Assange to whack apart and bolster their own ego? Nowhere!

AgainstPedos ago

Small story for you. When I started out in Hollywood, movie and TV extras were divided into 2 groups. Of course I wanted to join the much, much higher paying union group then under the Screen Extras Guild. Now under SAG-AFTRA, that meant I'd be getting fab medical & dental benefits, etc.

However there was fierce competition to get the fab paying union gigs even as a background artist, if you didn't have a relative who was a producer and solid connections to request you. Numerous non-union and union members, on set crew, those in hiring positions, all told me that I "would have to go to the parties."

What's wrong with going to the parties? As told to me by at least 1 crew member, "That means doing what NO Hollywood street hooker would ever do." I now realize everything would be filmed too.

Those that run Central Casting have had this practice since Day -1 of the movie industry. I once saw one of their casting directors French kiss and grope every single young woman who showed up at different "call times" for their wardrobe fittings.

I knew of other background artists who were a little more flirty on set who were asked by dishonest crew members to check the women's bathroom, as they supposedly had to repair something. Once inside the restroom, they were grabbed by the jerk who demanded a BJ. In essence they were then passed around to whomever.

Yes I know of 2 minor casting directors who got fired when their behavior got way, way out-of-hand. One worked for Central Casting. The other did all the casting for a Soap. Young men get passed around more so then young women. Common for actors to be given nicknames which EVERYONE in power knows, based on a combo of their name and sexual attribute. Yes that's a LOT of people knowing the sexual monicker that you've been given.

I was famous for being beyond naive and completely missing all of the sexual inuendo thrown at me. Didn't realize what was going on at all at the time. Then again I never used coke nor got drunk. Still I was given a sexual nickname teasing me about a certain body part.

4_InquiringMinds ago

Thanks for the small story :) It's like as with everything else...ppl love to focus on the big cheeses...like Harvey and forget that the abuse is much more extensive and prevalent than realized. Harvey may be hung out to dry but it won't stop unless the whole network is exposed. It's more like (as with killary and podesta) the 'Let's Lynch A Celebrity' show and then the coliseum spectators all go home satisfied. It's all designed to be entertainment and distraction so the abuse can continue. We are given bread crumbs so we won't look at the whole loaf. Others wait in the wings to fill the power vacuum. Not that it can't be shifted but our attention spans need to last longer than the ones 'thrown to the lions' so to speak.