Unless you have substantive evidence to the contrary, Michael Aquino (from the 1980s and 1990s) is NOT enough to claim the Air Force, today, is "the most Satanic of all the Armed Forces." Is there a connection between the four Shaw Air 'people' and Aquino? When I did my doctorate, speculation was not fact, but maybe I missed something.
In the same vein, do you have proof that 'the children are shipped around by the Air Force?'
@In_Umbris I like you require proof before believing things such as this but all the "incidents" over the years and the horrors of Hollywood Pedos is enough for me to establish that there is something more nefarious happening and it is more systematic than it is just isolated incidents. We still need evidence but I think we all know something is just not right.
I agree 100 percent, which makes it even more important to document evidence.
The classic psyop requires a level of complexity that the targeted recipients cannot deal with. Introducing layer upon layer of unsourced information that superficially appears to be related to the fundamental 'thread' acts to distract attention from the fundamental 'thread'. The only way of stopping distraction is to make each contribution easily verifiable. Hence, my request for 'proof' of connections. Anything else just adds to the distraction. Unfortunately, most people here think that their saying something, or linking to questionable websites/reports constitutes 'proof.'
view the rest of the comments →
In_Umbris ago
Unless you have substantive evidence to the contrary, Michael Aquino (from the 1980s and 1990s) is NOT enough to claim the Air Force, today, is "the most Satanic of all the Armed Forces." Is there a connection between the four Shaw Air 'people' and Aquino? When I did my doctorate, speculation was not fact, but maybe I missed something.
In the same vein, do you have proof that 'the children are shipped around by the Air Force?'
Kregan ago
@In_Umbris I like you require proof before believing things such as this but all the "incidents" over the years and the horrors of Hollywood Pedos is enough for me to establish that there is something more nefarious happening and it is more systematic than it is just isolated incidents. We still need evidence but I think we all know something is just not right.
In_Umbris ago
I agree 100 percent, which makes it even more important to document evidence.
The classic psyop requires a level of complexity that the targeted recipients cannot deal with. Introducing layer upon layer of unsourced information that superficially appears to be related to the fundamental 'thread' acts to distract attention from the fundamental 'thread'. The only way of stopping distraction is to make each contribution easily verifiable. Hence, my request for 'proof' of connections. Anything else just adds to the distraction. Unfortunately, most people here think that their saying something, or linking to questionable websites/reports constitutes 'proof.'