i recommend curious voaters do extensive research (beyond mainstream sources) on whether it's likely that al quaeda did 9/11 before jumping to the conclusion that isis did this based upon a few stray items that the msm is allowing through linking it to them. if you don't wanna do that research, i'd say be a little skeptical of this type of info. It's likely the 'isis' angle is being "floated" to occupy and pacify "conspiracy theorists" who see a lot of holes in the lone gunmen narrative. they cover all bases: a) people that aren't curious just accept that paddock somehow did all this by himself; b) those that are troubled by some circumstances just glom onto that it's isis and muslim terrorists again who seem to pull off these random horrible attacks all over the globe with no benefit ever flowing to islam (unless you believe they're all just mindless idiots who believe they just wanna strike out and kill in hopes that all non muslims will somehow withdraw from their lands and eventually disappear from the earth)