I am not sure, but you might really be on to something there. The Head of the NYT as we know is complicit with looking the other way when at the BBC and let Jimmy Savile just go about his merry way. Something just does not seam right. Also, this could be a Large Red Herring to take our eyes off the shooting or what else may be coming our way. I just don't trust them. Why if he is so darned innocent does he need an Army of Lawyers to defend him. Lanny Davis No Less?
view the rest of the comments →
Harriet1983 ago
I'm suspicious.Is this a psyop?
The Black Government and Hollywood and the New York Times have always been joined at the hip.
Kinda weird NYT puts out the story first? Do you think they are hell bent to put the story out
first so they can control the narrative? Ashley Judd is NWO. She is named as one of Weinstein's accussors.
carmencita ago
I am not sure, but you might really be on to something there. The Head of the NYT as we know is complicit with looking the other way when at the BBC and let Jimmy Savile just go about his merry way. Something just does not seam right. Also, this could be a Large Red Herring to take our eyes off the shooting or what else may be coming our way. I just don't trust them. Why if he is so darned innocent does he need an Army of Lawyers to defend him. Lanny Davis No Less?
Harriet1983 ago
You know what? I hear of no noise of Weinstein's being charged with anything.
When will he be arrested? Usually people hire lawyers to deal with the courts.
Is this a dog and pony show for the cattle?