New Hillary FOIA Emails on State.Gov... Filtered for Pizza? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by SoSpricyHotDog

Ok, ok, this is weird. So, I saw the new HRC emails dumped on State.gov:

https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx

Then you search for this to filter out the most recent into view "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton"

For shits n giggles I added "+ Pizza" to the search query.

The result was blank. But... not only were the results blank, the original search of "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton" is now also blank. Refreshing doesn't fix it. Clearing cache doesn't fix it. For that browser, I can no longer search for "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton" at all. It's totally blanked out.

Going to another browser allowed me to filter by "FOIA emails Hillary Clinton"

Weird, no?

In fact... any new search I do blocks access to the filtered emails now. No matter the search query. It seems that any search parameter modifiers can somehow block your access after a 2nd attempt.

Did I break something? Anyone else seeing this? Ways to fix?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

zeroinstinct ago

it's clearly the deep state or fake news.

10 days ago I said this bullshit you're all huffing was started by 4chan. you didn't refute it but said sorry and mentioned 2 websites. now i'm back and ready to listen to the evidence you have that precedes this nonsense.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

I don't have "evidence" - the https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx site fucked up in the midst of search queries... I've used it plenty of times before without issues. Thought it was strange, but most likely just a resource drain causing broken search results.

zeroinstinct ago

I told you 10 days ago that this nonsense was started by 4chan inventing a code. Back then you were talking about Awan, remember?

Well you apologised and told me to look to 2 different websites. Now I ant you to show me the evidence you have before the imaginary code 4chan invented from those hacked emails

SoSpricyHotDog ago

I was floating over a possible lead as it was being developed... I didn't see much of anything that resulted in a concrete lead that needed to be pursued.

And honestly, no, I don't remember... haha, sorry. I saw your comment, haven't had time to respond/dig deeper.

zeroinstinct ago

Awan is the floating lead? Doesn't matter that you bring up any key word for Trumps red meat.

You said Pizzagate has evidence that predates Podestas hack.Where is it?

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Wait... your post is all over the place... you are still focused on the Don Jr. meeting w/ Veselsketnya? You think sensitive material was passed back and forth? Where is it? From the most recent intel I saw this didn't lead to much of anything. And it was already established that the meeting itself wasn't illegal.

As for this:

Don't give me names of websites, explain the evidence other than 4chan inventing a code for hacked email which started this bullshit. I do believe paedophilia is far too rampant in all walks >of life. There has also been cover ups for all kinds of things but that isn't evidence for this, as i'm sure you understand.

i don't see links to the occult, neither do I see strange language, only the type of shorthand everyone uses with friends. It's funny because for all your denials you are admitting here it's all about the "strange languages" which the guys who gave you the grifter was happy to interpret.

You don't think the prior cover-ups and the extent at which they've been covered up, adds anything to what we're collectively looking into? Hampstead, Saville, Epstein, The Dutroux Affair, the Catholic Church, reports of Hollywood pedophelia/cover-ups... none of this causes you to draw any parallels when it comes to the PG evidence?

You don't see links to the occult? Spirit Cooking? Moloch? Mother Moon? Mentions of sacrifices? The artists/musicians that were related to those who are linked to the Podesta links?

You think these are all just innocent jokes? I think they may never be proven, but, that they offer important surrounding context.

zeroinstinct ago

What is the pizzagate evidence? Lets start there.

You don't see links to Russia? Manafort? Flynn? rohrababacher? Sater? The bit part players who were linked to Russians. Cohn? Page? Stone? Assange? Don jr? Kushner?

Are these are just innocent jokes? I'm sure several of these names will be indicted by the grand jury Mueller set up. And it will be obstruction of justice which impeaches trump before his own indictment.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

I've said numerous times that it's all circumstantial... I simply provided a number of examples that were also only circumstantial to begin with - and all underwent extreme levels of suppression in attempts to cover tracks.

Yes. I see some of those Russian connections, but certainly not all of them. Stone and Assange? Really? C"mon... you're drinking the wrong Kool Aid.

Manafort? Kushner? Don Jr? Yeah. Sure. I get it. But I want to see what they actually did/conspired to do... so far it's all discussions and seemingly unrelated biz deals.

Mueller is keeping a super tight lid on his findings, acting with a level of professionalism that makes Comey look like a fucking joke that he is/was. I am hoping that he delivers concrete findings for WHOMEVER (Left or Right) is implicated and cracks the whip.

But when it comes to Assange's evidence the Russia did not hack vs. domestic leaks... and comparing this to Crowdstrike's "report"? I'll put my money on Assange.

zeroinstinct ago

I'm not going to waste my time presenting a thoroughly researched post with links. I'll leave that to arewesure. However if you're willing to present your evidence in support of pizzagate, then i'll take the time to explain Russian infiltration and influence of the US elections.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Go for it...

BTW - the presentation of (circumstantial) evidence in support of Pizzagate is all of the high ranked posts here on Voat. To randomly hold me, individually, to a higher standard than everyone looking into this on Voat, Reddit, Chan, YouTube, etc... makes absolutely no sense.

To question why I'm here also doesn't make any sense. Because I single-handedly am unable to provide concrete evidence to prove PG, I should leave?

Your logic is sound.