It's safe to discount anything sourced from neonnettle unless corroborated elsewhere.
It's interesting to see so many defend themselves with tales of being molested as a child. Statistically it is relevant, but specifically in an adult, completely irrelevant. Psychological imprinting is powerful, but drives only circumvent rational when allowed. The facts still remains that they've made a reasoned choice to step widely outside of societal conventions and become a predator of its most cherished and vulnerable. Thus, for society's integrity they must be removed.
It's sad to see so many lenient sentences meted out to those who hold power. I wish more would cause an outcry. This too shakes society's integrity by making a mockery of the tenets of justice.
The neonnettle article of Downey's supposed expose has been deleted. His attorney probably threatened to sue... He never came out with that info. An anonymous source who many GUESSED might be him, posted that info through a gossip site SUPPOSEDLY written by an entertainment lawyer whose moniker is Enty. The source, rumored to be Downey, goes by the name of Himmmmm.
Regardless, we know pedophelia and Luciferianism is more than rampant in Hollywood. And your points are well taken and must be kept in mind. Being a victim, tragic as that is, does not give one permission to do unto others as was done onto them.
Never actually was RDJ. Could have been someone he knew and used his name with an OK knowing he'd publicly have to deny it or kill his career. Can't say you support Trump at all and not risk losing work in the super competitive world that is entertainment. Expanded version of the article above was printed in full on LSA along with a lot of other tales and on Jezebel. It's rumored to actually have been written by 2 men who are from old, old Hollywood families and thus know what's going on in Hollywood. Main purpose is to illustrate pedo behavior by parents/guardians of child stars. Also how willing they are to sell their kids for $$$ and fame. That's why "stage mother" has such bad vibes. Parents who see their kids as a paycheck started at the very, very beginning of Hollywood. Note what happened to MichaelJackson.
Agreed on all accounts. Every time a Himmmm thread aired on Enty's and other sites, they got a lot of attention but... no results. Nobody took up the gauntlet to investigate. Instead, they just stood around the car wreck and stared from the safety of the sidewalk. Any time I spoke out, about that or the threads regarding director Brian Singer being a pedo, I got shouted down. Finally, I gave up and left. If we can break through that solid wall of cognitive dissonance protected by the red carpet, we could make real progress.
view the rest of the comments →
Raps1 ago
It's safe to discount anything sourced from neonnettle unless corroborated elsewhere.
It's interesting to see so many defend themselves with tales of being molested as a child. Statistically it is relevant, but specifically in an adult, completely irrelevant. Psychological imprinting is powerful, but drives only circumvent rational when allowed. The facts still remains that they've made a reasoned choice to step widely outside of societal conventions and become a predator of its most cherished and vulnerable. Thus, for society's integrity they must be removed.
It's sad to see so many lenient sentences meted out to those who hold power. I wish more would cause an outcry. This too shakes society's integrity by making a mockery of the tenets of justice.
SoldierofLight ago
The neonnettle article of Downey's supposed expose has been deleted. His attorney probably threatened to sue... He never came out with that info. An anonymous source who many GUESSED might be him, posted that info through a gossip site SUPPOSEDLY written by an entertainment lawyer whose moniker is Enty. The source, rumored to be Downey, goes by the name of Himmmmm.
Regardless, we know pedophelia and Luciferianism is more than rampant in Hollywood. And your points are well taken and must be kept in mind. Being a victim, tragic as that is, does not give one permission to do unto others as was done onto them.
AgainstPedos ago
Never actually was RDJ. Could have been someone he knew and used his name with an OK knowing he'd publicly have to deny it or kill his career. Can't say you support Trump at all and not risk losing work in the super competitive world that is entertainment. Expanded version of the article above was printed in full on LSA along with a lot of other tales and on Jezebel. It's rumored to actually have been written by 2 men who are from old, old Hollywood families and thus know what's going on in Hollywood. Main purpose is to illustrate pedo behavior by parents/guardians of child stars. Also how willing they are to sell their kids for $$$ and fame. That's why "stage mother" has such bad vibes. Parents who see their kids as a paycheck started at the very, very beginning of Hollywood. Note what happened to MichaelJackson.
SoldierofLight ago
Agreed on all accounts. Every time a Himmmm thread aired on Enty's and other sites, they got a lot of attention but... no results. Nobody took up the gauntlet to investigate. Instead, they just stood around the car wreck and stared from the safety of the sidewalk. Any time I spoke out, about that or the threads regarding director Brian Singer being a pedo, I got shouted down. Finally, I gave up and left. If we can break through that solid wall of cognitive dissonance protected by the red carpet, we could make real progress.