Louise Bourgeois, the artist on Podesta's house also makes pedo works! (pizzagate)

submitted ago by angelafogo

Been doing some research on Louise Bourgeois. She is the one that made the golden stretch backwards sculpture in Tony Podesta house. The work is called the Arch of Hysteria. https://i2.wp.com/washingtonlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/WL_150430_17.jpg

As explained by Tracy Twyman, the work is related to Aleister Crowley Liber LXXVII. Which also shows on Exorcist III. http://tracytwyman.com/wp-content/uploads/liber-oz-dahmer-pose-aoa-lo.jpg

You can relate the work also to this scene from the Exorcist I http://blog.darkmoon.in/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/exorcist-spider-walk.jpg

NOW THIS IS IMPORTANT This work from Louise Bourgeois is called Father and Son. The son has an erection. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/09/02/e9/0902e9ee9021ab92bfacebddac6b9c1e.jpg

This one is another version of Father and son. Again the son with an erection. http://www.artnet.com/WebServices/images/ll00053lldZ34GFgPjECfDrCWvaHBOcBo1D/louise-bourgeois-father-and-son---study.jpg

Here is the same work with the same name. A sculpture from her in Seattle. Of course, people complained that it was a pedo thing. http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/58176848.jpg

Here is an article defending the artist's conception and calling the right wing basically "stupid" for thinking the work is pedo oriented. But, it clearly IS pedo oriented judging from the series. http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Right-wing-having-an-art-attack-over-nude-1184168.php

She also has a work called "The Destruction of the Father". Where she states “It is basically a table, the awful and terrifying family dinner table headed by the father who sits and gloats. And the others, the wife and children, what can they do? They sit there in silence. The mother, of course, tries to satisfy the tyrant, her husband. The children are filled with exasperation. […] So, in anger, they grabbed the man, threw him on the table, dismembered him and proceeded to devour him.” (1997) redhttps://huntressofartblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/luizb6.jpg?w=768

She also loves making cages, called "cell"s and putting tortured people inside of it. http://www.tate.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/grid-normal-12-cols/public/images/al00230-cell-xiv-portrait.jpg?itok=AkYl5eRW http://www.tate.org.uk/sites/default/files/styles/grid-normal-12-cols/public/images/al00230-cell-xiv-portrait.jpg?itok=AkYl5eRW http://www.hausderkunst.de/uploads/pics/630x360_Cell_XXVI_01.jpg

Clearly an artist very dear to the pedo cannibal elite.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

As explained by Tracy Twyman, the work is related to Aleister Crowley

This work has nothing to do with Aleister Crowley or the Exorcist. That's your interpretation.

The artist has been quite clear about her inspiration. It was Jean-Martin Charcot, a 19th neurologist who studied hysteria and influenced Freud.

And here's the image that inspired her. It's is from 1824 and depicts, Opisthotonus , a painful spasming of the muscles that victims of tetanus and hysterics get https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdWVo4fWAAEMM_4.jpgJPG Charcot the neurologist who Bourgeois has cited has her inspiration (and who was a teacher of Freud) talked about the arc de cercle that hysterical patients and epileptics sometimes suffered. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Krzysztof_Owczarek/publication/221926258/figure/fig6/AS:305190860279813@1449774579686/Fig-6-The-circular-arc-arc-de-cercle-Paul-Richer-Etudes-cliniques-sur.pngPNG

You can claim her "Cells" are jails, but how does that explain all the Cells that have nobody in them, tortured or otherwise? How does this simplistic interpretation account for this?

It's about a collection of objects. Museum goers could not walk among the objects but had to consider them all together. In that way, it's less like sculpture and more like a theater set. They are world's you peer into.
https://i0.wp.com/www.guggenheim.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/art-passage-dangereux-bilbao-bourgeouis-exhibition.jpg?w=870

http://images.artnet.com/images_us/magazine/features/lowery/lowery6-15-10-6.jpg

https://tapesandteapot.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/cell.jpg?w=640

http://blog.artintern.net/data/pic/600_800/64321338831396.jpg

http://www.domusweb.it/content/dam/domusweb/en/news/2015/02/25/louise_bourgeois_the_cells/rmedium/domus-07-bourgeois-cells.jpg

Commoner ago

How do you explain the little boy?

angelafogo ago

The little boy with an erection.

Commoner ago

I don't think he can explain that one.

angelafogo ago

Maybe some Freud related bs that justifies that every son wants to screw his dad. We are talking about Freud here. He received childhood abused patients and stated "These are fantasies. My patients are lying" And lets not forget about his grandson. All jew elite pedophile. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/14/how-clement-freud-invited-kate-and-gerry-mccann-for-lunch-after/

its all part of the same plan.