BREAKING: DNC Payments to FBI-Backed IT Guru Crowdstrike Coincide With Seth Rich and Shawn Lucas Deaths

BREAKING: DNC Payments to FBI-Backed IT Guru Crowdstrike Coincide With Seth Rich and Shawn Lucas Deaths (pizzagate)

submitted 7.6 years ago by quantokitty

Relevance: The Awan brothers, the DNC, and Seth Rich's death are central to #pizzagate. Finding out who was involved in his alleged murder will blow the lid off pizzagate .

Here's the link to a breaking story:

http://truepundit.com/dnc-payments-to-it-guru-crowdstrike-coincide-with-seth-rich-and-shawn-lucas-deaths/

In their report, America First Media Group shows that the first payments made were preemptive measures on May 5th, 2016. They add that the next payment to Crowdstrike, totaling $98,849.84, took place on July 11th. ...

The report indicates: “The final payment to date is August 3rd, 2016. This coincides with another murder in the District of Columbia. Shawn Lucas, who died on August 2nd of last year, was the DNC Process Server and close friend of Seth Rich.”

The Awan brothers truly are the key to blowing this conspiracy wide open.

57 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoSpricyHotDog 7.6 years ago

Reposting my comment below because it is now hidden as a result of "Are We Sure" getting downvoated into oblivion:

If these implications are true... and these large payments coincide with some kind of action (or inaction) related to Shawn Lucas and/or Seth Rich, that are made by the DNC. The payments were made before/after the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz by the way:

7/10/16 = Date of Seth Rich's death
7/11/16 = $98k paid to Crowdstrike for "Maintenance" via the DNC
7/24/16 = D.W. Schultz resignation (I'd like to remind you that she maintained Imran Awan's employment until the day after he was arrested - 7/24/17 & fired on 7/25/17)
8/2/16 = Date of Shawn Lucas' death
8/3/16 = $113k paid to Crowdstrike for "Maintenance" via the DNC

Multiple email threads from the DNC leak implicate "Imran" (but no Awan... nor is he CC'ed on any emails) just before this timeline opened up. Indicating that Awan had access to at least Pelosi's and DWS's hardware:

"On May 4, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Kroll, Amy wrote: Just spoke to Imran, call me whenever GB and I’ll update you, don’t delete anything yet."

"On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Kroll, Amy wrote: I do not have access to her ipad password, but Imran does. I’ll call Geoff now"

"Subject: Re: DWS MOVEMENTS - 5/12/2016 Pelosi is doing s closed door meeting. No staff or anyone allowed. Kaitlyn come to Rayburn room and get her iPad for Imran. Thanks."

Those are the most direct mentions of access/higher ups at the DNC working w/ Imran. Interesting that they don't just include him on the emails... no? If it's a security issue, then he clearly should not have had access to their hardware in the first place. Especially not if he is the only one on the chain that had their passwords!

So... with all of the circumstances above, you're going to tell me that Crowdstrike completed the investigation to "determine" that the DNC hacks were of a Russian origin. And never bothered to interface with, interview, or meet Imran Awan - the highest paid IT staffer on their payroll?

For putting so much faith into the Russian hacking narrative Crowdstrike was paid to weave, you clearly don't have much faith in their investigatory prowess if they didn't even have a discussion with Mr. Awan. He should have been one of the first people they met with.

link

quantokitty 7.6 years ago

Thanks for reposting this. I did miss it.

No it doesn't make any sense if they didn't know or had doubt. I can only conclude that there was no reason to ask Awan because they did know. If they'd asked him and gotten the truth, they might have been forced to testify to what he answered. This way they can just pretend they believed the Russian hacking fairy tale.

And not for nothing, but those payments look so damning.

link

Are_we__sure 7.6 years ago

And not for nothing, but those payments look so damning.

This is called confirmation bias and you give a classic example

Confirmation bias... is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses..... .People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs.

Confirmation bias is when we ignore all other explanations. For example,. Do these bills seem excessively high? Because Crowdstrike did actually do work, so any "hush money" would be on top of that. How many people would you have to pay off?

Also Crowdstrike identified APT 28 and APT 29 as the culprits. Was that report fake? Because a fake report would cost something like 9 figures. Why? Because if independent companies examined what they did, but didn't confirm it, they could be driven out of business. They are a one billion dollar company. If you had a one billion dollar company, what would you charge for a few months work for consulting, hush money for 2 murders, and a fake report that could drive you out of business or make you a 500 million dollar company instead of one billion? I would charge a lot for that.

I have a question for the investigators. How much did the DNC pay Crowdstrike in 2016?