Jane Webb 9 July 2015
Delivered
Dear Independent Police Complaints Commission,
I would like to know whether it is within a police offers jurisdiction to speak with a witness in a non professional capacity about a sexual abuse case, without it being recorded and without other officers being present?
I would further like to know whether interviewing officers are trained on how to conduct themselves with regards to body language when interviewing a potential rape victim.
I would also like to know whether retractions are considered valid where two potential rape victims retracted testimony is not corroborative, whereas their original testimony was.
I would lastly like to know whether it is lawful for an officer to explicitly and knowingly lead a witness into reasoning that they themselves have not brought up first of all.
Yours faithfully,
Jane Webb
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/police_conduct_interviewing_stra#comment-64985
Independent Police Complaints Commission did not have the information requested.
Charlotte Peters Rock left an annotation ( 8 December 2015)
One might think that series of questions was reasonable enough to require an answer from a body lawfully in place to oversee police conduct.. assuming that is it's job.
IPCC surely has some form of documentary remit which could aid this member of the public?
Interviewing Officer Review
Officer Steve
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO0izt7uaMY
Internet Surveillance / MET Police
CASE FILE- POLICE INTERFERENCE WITH WITNESS A (VIDEO)
https://vid.me/y88c
INTERVIEWING OFFICER WEIRD PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS & SECRET LANGUAGE
https://vid.me/j3wG
CHILD WITNESS "A" DISCLOSES CULT MEMBERS USE "SECRET LANGUAGE"
https://vid.me/ADXy
Ricky Dearman father of the Hampstead children, is in business with high ranking members of the police, as disclosed in his financial records here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajgck-q_WqM
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@OcculusDiadus, what is your main account name? Why are you using a brand new alt to push Hampstead links? You clearly know multiple users to ping, so what gives?
OcculusDiadus ago
Does Millennial have the right to overturn your decisions?
Vindicator ago
He can remove any post he thinks violates the rules. Only an [O] (owner) of the sub can overrule him. I also can remove any post that I think violates the rules. We don't always see posts the same way.
OcculusDiadus ago
Surely by standards of common decency, your decision should have been left in place. Does action to the contrary not hint at an element of disrespect towards your moderation capabilities? @crensch What do you think? @jangles @jem777 @LA_Trump
Crensch ago
I think there's a sticky you can weigh in on.
OcculusDiadus ago
I just presumed Millennial was up in the hierarchy and had the right to undermine your determination.
OcculusDiadus ago
I must confess I was a little surprised on the turn around, when you had already said it was ok and I had spent time in putting it together in good faith it would validate it remaining on the main forum for discussion, alas, I was incorrect.
OcculusDiadus ago
My account was blocked even though you had approved the content of my post here and thanked me for including a reference at the top of the post that explained the links included.
See here:
SWORDFISH RETURNS WITH PIZZAGATE HOME RUN https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2136201