From /pol anon re Monica Silsby and the Huma emails -
"it's important to me to repeat this info from the last thread.
i skipped straight to the fourth set, to see if they talk about silsby/haiti during the sentencing.
the emails appear to skip, from 4/24/2010 to 7/19/2010 (pages 264 - 270) and completely blank out on may and june.
i also looked in the third set - pgs 355/356 skip from 1/18/2010 (silsby is in haiti at this point) to 2/8/2010 (silsby has been arrested before this date)
complete blank.
any interaction between clinton and huma about silsby and haiti have been intentionally dropped from this batch."
view the rest of the comments →
alphabravo ago
From /pol anon re Monica Silsby and the Huma emails -
"it's important to me to repeat this info from the last thread.
i skipped straight to the fourth set, to see if they talk about silsby/haiti during the sentencing.
the emails appear to skip, from 4/24/2010 to 7/19/2010 (pages 264 - 270) and completely blank out on may and june.
i also looked in the third set - pgs 355/356 skip from 1/18/2010 (silsby is in haiti at this point) to 2/8/2010 (silsby has been arrested before this date)
complete blank.
any interaction between clinton and huma about silsby and haiti have been intentionally dropped from this batch."
Truthseeker3000 ago
Excellent point. Controlled leak perhaps? This is the shit we want to see and surprise, it's not there. How convenient.
alphabravo ago
Indeed. The question is, and another lawsuit should ask why there is a gap of 3 months in this release?
I wonder if any other months are missing, or entire 2 month periods? Anyone know?