for all the positive stuff people say on here about James Woods, the main thing that comes to my mind when I think of James Woods is that he STARRED in the movie "The Indictment" which was all about debunking the McMartin Child Ritual Abuse Scandal! I know NOTHING of him coming out and denouncing starring in that movie. As such, I do not understand why people here praise him.
Overall though, I'm not sharing this link to denounce James Woods, but because I think it is relevant to PG as it deals with Nambla and Hollywood Child Sexual Exploitation
but if you look at the Indictment and then his dating history, it doesn't make sense. he should be called out for starring in the movie "The Indicment" and see what he has to say about it.
I dunno if you can blame a guy for taking an acting job. If they made a movie about Hitler and he played Hitler, that doesn't mean he condones what Hitler did just as when Peter Brady played Benedict Arnold in the school play and the guys at school started calling him a traitor. Stupid. The fact that he's dated 19 and 20 year olds doesn't bother me. They're legal adults.
I totally disagree (without resorting to calling you stupid.) the whole purpose of the movie The Indicment is to discredit the victims and say they were lying. It's like if a movie came out right now "debunking" Pizza Gate and making a mockery of the many many victims of child sexual abuse.... that wouldn't simply be displaying history. it's displaying an agenda. one that covers up ritual child abuse.
The movie was made over 20 years ago and it was an Oliver Stone movie. I don't know what his motivations were for making the movie but the movie was well received, he was nominated for multiple awards for his portrayal, and SOMEONE had to play the part. He may have had no idea any of the facts about the case and merely read the script and thought it was a good part. I dunno but I certainly don't believe that he is synonymous with every character he's ever played in a TV or movie. Now if he did press conferences and said he agreed that the victim was lying that'd be a different story.
view the rest of the comments →
3141592653 ago
for all the positive stuff people say on here about James Woods, the main thing that comes to my mind when I think of James Woods is that he STARRED in the movie "The Indictment" which was all about debunking the McMartin Child Ritual Abuse Scandal! I know NOTHING of him coming out and denouncing starring in that movie. As such, I do not understand why people here praise him.
Overall though, I'm not sharing this link to denounce James Woods, but because I think it is relevant to PG as it deals with Nambla and Hollywood Child Sexual Exploitation
HarveyKlinger ago
If you follow him on Twitter you'll quickly understand. He's one of us, shitposting and all.
3141592653 ago
I'm aware of his twitters postings. thanks
HarveyKlinger ago
For me, that was the main reason. He's brutal.
3141592653 ago
but if you look at the Indictment and then his dating history, it doesn't make sense. he should be called out for starring in the movie "The Indicment" and see what he has to say about it.
HarveyKlinger ago
I dunno if you can blame a guy for taking an acting job. If they made a movie about Hitler and he played Hitler, that doesn't mean he condones what Hitler did just as when Peter Brady played Benedict Arnold in the school play and the guys at school started calling him a traitor. Stupid. The fact that he's dated 19 and 20 year olds doesn't bother me. They're legal adults.
3141592653 ago
I totally disagree (without resorting to calling you stupid.) the whole purpose of the movie The Indicment is to discredit the victims and say they were lying. It's like if a movie came out right now "debunking" Pizza Gate and making a mockery of the many many victims of child sexual abuse.... that wouldn't simply be displaying history. it's displaying an agenda. one that covers up ritual child abuse.
HarveyKlinger ago
The movie was made over 20 years ago and it was an Oliver Stone movie. I don't know what his motivations were for making the movie but the movie was well received, he was nominated for multiple awards for his portrayal, and SOMEONE had to play the part. He may have had no idea any of the facts about the case and merely read the script and thought it was a good part. I dunno but I certainly don't believe that he is synonymous with every character he's ever played in a TV or movie. Now if he did press conferences and said he agreed that the victim was lying that'd be a different story.
3141592653 ago
No, someone did not have to take the part, the movie should never have been made
Whattheheck321 ago
And maybe it was making the movie that helped wake him up.