In the United States, FinCEN requires that an SAR be filed by a financial institution when the financial institution suspects insider abuse by an employee; violations of law aggregating over $5,000 where a subject can be identified;[clarification needed] violations of law aggregating over $25,000 regardless of a potential subject; transactions aggregating $5,000 or more that involve potential money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act; computer intrusion; or when a financial institution knows that a customer is operating as an unlicensed money services business.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspicious_activity_report
So transactions across hundreds of possible businesses involving $5kâ25k are examined as suspicious, but the FBI claims only 1% turn out to be actionable.
It's known via the Franklin Savings Conspiracy case that the FBI or certain agents cover for sex trafficking & this type complicity was also seen in the Finders/CIA cult trafficking case.
That of all the hundreds or thousands of businesses that trigger a SARS report of large transactions, usually bank deposits or money transfers, that randomly "pizza cases" stand out above all others, besides the FBI published the "cheese pizza" definition among sex trafficking terms seems more than coincidence.
As if to say, oh ignore those CP transactions, we let those slide. Unless running a pizza business is so outrageously profitable that $5kâ25k days are commonplace. I worked at a Dominoes briefly & like most businesses cash is deposited nightly, though hard to imagine such volume at least in a small metropolis of 50k in my experience.
Maybe there's nothing to it but post Pizzagate seems more than coincidental, while the rationale of federal agencies being involved in sex trafficking, like drug running, begs credulity.
view the rest of the comments â
Da-Cat ago
In the United States, FinCEN requires that an SAR be filed by a financial institution when the financial institution suspects insider abuse by an employee; violations of law aggregating over $5,000 where a subject can be identified;[clarification needed] violations of law aggregating over $25,000 regardless of a potential subject; transactions aggregating $5,000 or more that involve potential money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act; computer intrusion; or when a financial institution knows that a customer is operating as an unlicensed money services business. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspicious_activity_report
Da-Cat ago
So transactions across hundreds of possible businesses involving $5kâ25k are examined as suspicious, but the FBI claims only 1% turn out to be actionable.
It's known via the Franklin Savings Conspiracy case that the FBI or certain agents cover for sex trafficking & this type complicity was also seen in the Finders/CIA cult trafficking case.
That of all the hundreds or thousands of businesses that trigger a SARS report of large transactions, usually bank deposits or money transfers, that randomly "pizza cases" stand out above all others, besides the FBI published the "cheese pizza" definition among sex trafficking terms seems more than coincidence.
As if to say, oh ignore those CP transactions, we let those slide. Unless running a pizza business is so outrageously profitable that $5kâ25k days are commonplace. I worked at a Dominoes briefly & like most businesses cash is deposited nightly, though hard to imagine such volume at least in a small metropolis of 50k in my experience.
Maybe there's nothing to it but post Pizzagate seems more than coincidental, while the rationale of federal agencies being involved in sex trafficking, like drug running, begs credulity.