The whole post fails rule 3 and the title fails rule 3.
Clarity is not just some subjective thing, this post is objectively not clear.
And for a discussion post, OP discusses very little.
The majority of the post is a link wall with no discussion about the links.
The post is about that Mayor
No, the post is a link to another thread about the mayor.
If this was a reasonably formatted timeline with a speculative conclusion that crafts an overarching narrative that would be great - this topic is hard enough to follow and timelines would be a big help in sorting patterns from the noise.
If you feel so strongly that this post should exist in the main thread, apply the effort to address my criticisms and suggestions and make it a worthy post (or help OP work on it)
view the rest of the comments →
VictorSteinerDavion ago
The whole post fails rule 3 and the title fails rule 3.
Clarity is not just some subjective thing, this post is objectively not clear.
And for a discussion post, OP discusses very little.
The majority of the post is a link wall with no discussion about the links.
No, the post is a link to another thread about the mayor.
If this was a reasonably formatted timeline with a speculative conclusion that crafts an overarching narrative that would be great - this topic is hard enough to follow and timelines would be a big help in sorting patterns from the noise.
If you feel so strongly that this post should exist in the main thread, apply the effort to address my criticisms and suggestions and make it a worthy post (or help OP work on it)