This is my first post, so I don't expect many to take me seriously, but a few of you may recognize my username from r/t_D.
I think Senate Anon is a limited hangout, antigoy disinfo. Much of what he reveals may be true, but Bernie not blackmailed? Many in the deepstate are Anglophiles? There are many more red flags, but those two should be enough for anyone to realize something is off about his claims.
If many in the deepstate are, indeed, Anglophiles, the UK would not be in the current condition that it's in.
If Bernie was never blackmailed, does it means he is clean? Well, we know he's dirty, so the anon either lied or communicated that Bernie goes along with the deepstate/antigoy agenda without having to be blackmailed.
My theory is that they know something will have to be offered to the public. They know mass arrests of low level pedos isn't satisfying the pg research community. So now, they decide to get ahead of the real investigation and bait people to create noise and take out a slice of the gang of their own choosing. And why not the the incompetent goys from the rust belt, who fucked up the election. Indiana is the capital of pizzagate worldwide? LOL.
view the rest of the comments →
ababcb ago
There were a few things that confused me too, but he called out the property at the Royal Order of Jesters have a building in Adams Morgan, under Billiken property management. Last I heard, things go on there. This property turns out to be Perrys.DC which is right next to the old "Comet Liquor" building and is where James Alefantis purchased his sign from. Senate Anon is definitely legitimate because of this.
It makes sense that Bernie Sanders is clean. If Bernie were not clean he would not have been allowed to run against Hillary Clinton for so long and in such a damaging way. Both Bernie and Trumps actions on the campaign trail suggest that neither of them are blackmailed.
8Ball ago
Unless he's controlled opposition. In 1969 he wrote an essay advocating for underage sex.
ababcb ago
Controlled opposition against who? If what you are suggesting is true that has to mean that Hillary was supposed to lose and that the entire election was theater.
twistedmac11 ago
Everything played out how it was supposed to. Votes don't matter. Who won is who was meant to win. Hillary was meant to lose. All of the two party stuff is a school play to make citizens feel like they have a say. Keeps the masses appeased.
8Ball ago
A Rothschild school play. Bernie threw the primary for hillary. Hillary threw the election for Trump. If voting mattered, (((they))) would make it illegal.
twistedmac11 ago
Exactly. They wouldn't actually just hand the people the power to overrule them. The world is a stage. People need to get a grasp on how deep this really goes. Everything is orchestrated.