You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

bopper ago

"... tell a larger story that's gonna be pretty disturbing to the American people." Huh. It would have to be pretty disturbing to shock most Americans. So do tell. Thanks for this info. (The congressman has quite the grave look on his face.)

https://youtu.be/FxSlYdIYQ7E?t=168

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Considering most Americans still think only 2 towers fell on 9/11, haven't bother to read a single leaked email, think Trump is Russian and couldn't find their own state on a map... it's going to need to be:

  1. Disturbing
  2. Actually picked up by the MSM
  3. Crammed into their fucking skulls at a 3rd grade reading level
  4. Not be flanked by endless false flags
  5. Actually receive ongoing media coverage, and not just a page 16 "blip" on the radar next to a story about some gold medal winning poodle

srayzie ago

👏🏻 That's right! I can't believe that after all these years how many people still think only 2 buildings fell on 9/11.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

(Total Sidenote re: Building 7) I will admit however, that being a die-hard "9/11 Truther" for many years, @RweSure opened my eyes to some rather serious claims re: Building 7... paired with the recent findings published a few days ago from the Alaska Fairbanks study funded by the A&E 9/11 for Truth group (which apparently determined that fire did weaken it, but the shockwaves unseated the beams... and not anything like controlled demolition)... it doesn't rule out foul play, I think the events that day were still all very suspicious, but, just keeping an open mind. Including variants of the official explanation which I previously thought were total BS.

srayzie ago

Did you know that's a shill? He has several accounts that sound like arewesure. He has negative contributions points. Did you look at his profile? If you did your own research and believe that then ok. But I wanted to let you know who it is that opened your eyes in case you didn't know.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Oh, I'm 99% sure he's a shill... but, he took the time to surprisingly craft an incredibly detail-rich post, with some pretty serious links to back it all up. I was honestly shocked. Usually his posts are limited to basically saying "Yeah, right" without much substance. I'd even go as far as to say he's NOT a shill, and just an incredibly, weirdly, dedicated skeptic of everything/anything that isn't approved by the mainstream.

His post on Building 7 was so intense that I told him he should've been hired by the 9/11 Commission to write their book. Haha.

But, yeah, 99% of his nay-saying is nonsense and CNN-worthy schlock.

UgTr2 ago

I agree that he's a weird skeptic, and I think that skeptics are valuable when groupthink can take root.

srayzie ago

Lol ok. I just wanted to make sure you knew