Hillary has zero ties to Silsby. The truth is there is zero evidence Hillary or anyone else in Washington, DC knew who Laura Silsby was before she got arrested.
As for this thing. This is not a "paper" making these claims. It's an opinion columnist. So this is not from a reporter.
This reporter gets several things wrong.
Clinton, you probably remember, “lost” her private emails, which she’d been storing on a personal computer server.
Clinton has never said she lost her emails. She asked her lawyer to separate her old personal emails from her old work emails. The work emails were turned over to State and she asked for the others to be deleted.
Clinton’s emails, which were stolen by the Russians, have never been found.
Stolen by the Russians? What? This would be his big attention getting story if he could prove this.
the messages are still in the possession of the National Security Agency (NSA), which offered to give them to the FBI.
Both the getting and the giving would be illegal acts. This did not happen. This guy is completely wrong.
The NSA does not capture the contents of American emails. They capture and store metadata: From, To, Date/time sent. But it's illegal to access this metadata without a FISA court order--the capture this metadata, but are not allowed to do anything with it until they can prove a connection to a terrorism case.
I’ve also mentioned that Comey fibbed when he said his agents unanimously agreed that prosecution was unnecessary. In fact, my source says that FBI agents were irate about the decision not to go after Clinton.
This appears to be conflating a couple of things. It's the FBI agents who worked on the Clinton case who were unanimous. Other agents might have been pissed, but they have no special information about the case.
AreweSure. I am pretty damn sure you are not just a citizen investigator as I have pointed out many times. You give yourself away. At least use bad grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. to throw people off the scent a little...good god.
You of course you must realize this "journalist" you smeared as not a journalist in True Pundit is actually a former FBI Agent. You must know this right? His sources aren't just sources they are the real deal.
The Laura Silsby arguement is old dude. You have already lost. Even if she (HRC) did not know Silsby (which she does) the nightmare of Haiti and everything else is damning enough.
BTW I agree about the NSA needing a FISA warrant. I also agree you can't unmask American citizens or use surveillance on them in violation of the constitution. Have you heard of Dennis Montgomery or Bill Binney? Ask James Comey about him he knows him I believe......apparently since that whole immunity as an NSA whistleblower deal went down after Snowden.
. At least use bad grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. to throw people off the scent a little...good god.
I'm glad you noticed. I edit my posts if I see bad grammer or typos.....(I just mispelled grammar and misspelled.....but I'll leave those ones in.) I like good writing and appreciate those who take the time.
But I am just a citizen. Slacking off at my regular job. I spent a little time on voat today and a lot more time on ebay looking for a cheap Telecaster guitar. Almost had one for $65 today.
I said he was an opinion columnist and not a reporter. And this is significant because when he says the NSA has these emails, he is not reporting that as fact, he's given his opinion and the editing rules are different for opinion columnists and straight reporters.
The Laura Silsby arguement is old dude. You have already lost.
Of course, I haven't lost on this, I'm perfectly correct on this. Whether or not I'll convince people that they were lied to by this guy is another story, but the evidence is amazingly clear this guy was wrong. So wrong, I believe he knew he was lying.
William Craddick @williamcraddick Investigative journalist, discoverer of the Clinton-Silsby trafficking scandal, Founder and Editor in Chief at Disobedient Media
I also agree you can't unmask American citizens or use surveillance on them in violation of the constitution.
This didn't happen whatsoever and Trump's Justice Department just had to admit he was lying about that.
DOJ: No evidence Trump Tower was wiretapped
The Department of Justice said in a court filing Friday it has no evidence that former President Obama ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower, despite President Trump’s assertions.
The statement was made in a Friday court filing related to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by American Oversight, a liberal watchdog organization founded by former Obama administration officials.
“Both the FBI and NSD confirm that they have no records related to wiretaps as described the March 4, 2017 tweets,” the DOJ wrote in the court filing, obtained by Fox News.
and the Susan Rice unmasking fell apart months ago.
I do know Bill Binney and he's often incorrect, but he is not a straight out con-man like Dennis Montgomery. Those two dudes are world's apart. You insult Binney by including Montgomery with him.
You are not just a citizen give everyone a break. And again this columnist is as I stated a former FBI agent and you know it.
If you know Binney then you know why he resigned. Binney has made numerous appeal stating NSA has the documents and calling the blame Russia game a joke even authoring a lenghthy Intel report documenting how it was an obvious inside leak and the FBI and NSA knew this and lied.
The DOJ did not come out and admit anything about unmasking. Read the fine print of who sued for the records and what was stated exactly.....be careful with your words because they will be put on blast.
Who funds "American Oversight" and what was said?
Ask Devin Nunes if Montgomery is a con since he has had at least two additional NSA step forward.
Well I'm a smart dude interested in politics and I have writing experience, so i'm not the average citizen. If you think I have connections to to government or any political groups. I do not. Y'all are just so paranoid and so within your own circle that I seem suspect.
And again this columnist is as I stated a former FBI agent and you know it.
Are you talking about something previously? Because I didn't talk about True Pundit today. The guy I mentioned was from the NY Post. Now that I think about it, do we know who writes TruePundit, because they don't have bylines do they?
Binney has made numerous appeal stating NSA has the documents and calling the blame Russia game a joke even authoring a lenghthy Intel report documenting how it was an obvious inside leak and the FBI and NSA knew this and lied.
The VIPS Letter was not an intel report, it was an open letter. And VIPS relied on outside technical help, Binney is not qualified to do the forensics as it's not his specialty.
Several folks from VIPS refused to sign that letter. One of the reasons was there's no proof that the data timing there were analyzing happened on the DNC servers. It's a giant flaw that forensic folks pointed out immediately when this first came out.
It is important to note that it’s equally plausible that the cited July 5, 2016, event was carried out on a server separate from the DNC or elsewhere, and with data previously copied, transferred, or even exfiltrated from the DNC.
.....if the data was not on the DNC server on July 5, 2016, then none of this VIPS analysis matters (including the categorically stated fact that the local copy was acquired by an insider) and simply undermines the credibility of any and all analysis in the VIPS memo when joined with this flawed predicate.
The DOJ did not come out and admit anything about unmasking. Read the fine print of who sued for the records and what was stated exactly........
Do you think the DOJ would have given different facts if they were sued by somebody else? This is ludicrous.
They didn't have to say anything about unmasking Devin Nunes story fell apart months ago.
Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dems and Republicans
A review of the surveillance material flagged by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes shows no inappropriate action by Susan Rice or any other Obama administration official, Republican and Democratic Congressional aides who have been briefed on the matter told NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/susan-rice-did-nothing-wrong-say-both-dems-republicans-n747406
Top Republican: Controversy surrounding Susan Rice unmasking was 'created' by Devin Nunes
The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Friday that the controversy surrounding whether former National Security Adviser Susan Rice politicized intelligence about President Donald Trump and his associates "was all created" by House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes.
http://www.businessinsider.com/burr-says-questions-about-susan-rice-unmasking-created-by-devin-nunes-2017-7
You quoting NBC news or even Democrats and Republicans is the joke....you are taking a stand for the most incompetent, corrupt group of people. Not all but many and some are involved in child sex trafficking. Your continued excuses for them is laughable.
Hi, with all due respect, you cited Dennis Montgomery as a source and then to back it up you cited Devin Nunes. And you don't even understand how funny this is.
You have no evidence of anyone in this thread being involved in child sex trafficking and you know it.
Switching from one heavily-used-and-downvoted shill account to another heavily-used-and-downvoted shill account does not make your argument any more valid (especially when you don't even bother changing the name that much between the two accounts).
With all due respect you switched to RweSure from AreWeSure because you somehow think no one is catching on.
No, I switched because I was not able to continue the conversation under RweSure. That's why my accounts are transparently the same person.
HRC is not involved in child trafficking. There's zero evidence of that. You do have me on Silsby, but again, HRC didn't know this woman before she went to Haiti and got arrested. Clinton only got involved because she was an American arrested overseas and that is the one of the duties of the State Department as I pointed out many, many times.
https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/emergencies/arrest.html
One of the highest priorities of the Department of State and U.S. embassies and consulates abroad is to provide assistance to U.S. citizens incarcerated abroad. The Department of State is committed to ensuring fair and humane treatment for U.S. citizens imprisoned overseas. We stand ready to assist incarcerated citizens and their families within the limits of our authority in accordance with international law, domestic and foreign law.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we__sure ago
Hillary has zero ties to Silsby. The truth is there is zero evidence Hillary or anyone else in Washington, DC knew who Laura Silsby was before she got arrested.
As for this thing. This is not a "paper" making these claims. It's an opinion columnist. So this is not from a reporter.
This reporter gets several things wrong.
Clinton has never said she lost her emails. She asked her lawyer to separate her old personal emails from her old work emails. The work emails were turned over to State and she asked for the others to be deleted.
Stolen by the Russians? What? This would be his big attention getting story if he could prove this.
Both the getting and the giving would be illegal acts. This did not happen. This guy is completely wrong.
The NSA does not capture the contents of American emails. They capture and store metadata: From, To, Date/time sent. But it's illegal to access this metadata without a FISA court order--the capture this metadata, but are not allowed to do anything with it until they can prove a connection to a terrorism case.
This appears to be conflating a couple of things. It's the FBI agents who worked on the Clinton case who were unanimous. Other agents might have been pissed, but they have no special information about the case.
Jem777 ago
AreweSure. I am pretty damn sure you are not just a citizen investigator as I have pointed out many times. You give yourself away. At least use bad grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. to throw people off the scent a little...good god.
You of course you must realize this "journalist" you smeared as not a journalist in True Pundit is actually a former FBI Agent. You must know this right? His sources aren't just sources they are the real deal.
The Laura Silsby arguement is old dude. You have already lost. Even if she (HRC) did not know Silsby (which she does) the nightmare of Haiti and everything else is damning enough.
BTW I agree about the NSA needing a FISA warrant. I also agree you can't unmask American citizens or use surveillance on them in violation of the constitution. Have you heard of Dennis Montgomery or Bill Binney? Ask James Comey about him he knows him I believe......apparently since that whole immunity as an NSA whistleblower deal went down after Snowden.
Are_we__sure ago
I'm glad you noticed. I edit my posts if I see bad grammer or typos.....(I just mispelled grammar and misspelled.....but I'll leave those ones in.) I like good writing and appreciate those who take the time.
But I am just a citizen. Slacking off at my regular job. I spent a little time on voat today and a lot more time on ebay looking for a cheap Telecaster guitar. Almost had one for $65 today.
Which journalist are you talking about? The Gateway Pundit points to a column in the New York Post. This one: http://nypost.com/2017/09/04/proof-that-investigating-trump-is-starting-to-backfire-for-democrats/
I said he was an opinion columnist and not a reporter. And this is significant because when he says the NSA has these emails, he is not reporting that as fact, he's given his opinion and the editing rules are different for opinion columnists and straight reporters.
Of course, I haven't lost on this, I'm perfectly correct on this. Whether or not I'll convince people that they were lied to by this guy is another story, but the evidence is amazingly clear this guy was wrong. So wrong, I believe he knew he was lying.
There's basically no way to read this document and not understand it was written after the Haitian Earthquake of 2010. This dude is a hoaxer. https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3776
This didn't happen whatsoever and Trump's Justice Department just had to admit he was lying about that.
and the Susan Rice unmasking fell apart months ago.
I do know Bill Binney and he's often incorrect, but he is not a straight out con-man like Dennis Montgomery. Those two dudes are world's apart. You insult Binney by including Montgomery with him.
Jem777 ago
You are not just a citizen give everyone a break. And again this columnist is as I stated a former FBI agent and you know it.
If you know Binney then you know why he resigned. Binney has made numerous appeal stating NSA has the documents and calling the blame Russia game a joke even authoring a lenghthy Intel report documenting how it was an obvious inside leak and the FBI and NSA knew this and lied.
The DOJ did not come out and admit anything about unmasking. Read the fine print of who sued for the records and what was stated exactly.....be careful with your words because they will be put on blast. Who funds "American Oversight" and what was said?
Ask Devin Nunes if Montgomery is a con since he has had at least two additional NSA step forward.
Are_we__sure ago
Well I'm a smart dude interested in politics and I have writing experience, so i'm not the average citizen. If you think I have connections to to government or any political groups. I do not. Y'all are just so paranoid and so within your own circle that I seem suspect.
Are you talking about something previously? Because I didn't talk about True Pundit today. The guy I mentioned was from the NY Post. Now that I think about it, do we know who writes TruePundit, because they don't have bylines do they?
The VIPS Letter was not an intel report, it was an open letter. And VIPS relied on outside technical help, Binney is not qualified to do the forensics as it's not his specialty.
The Nation has more on the VIPS letter https://www.thenation.com/article/a-leak-or-a-hack-a-forum-on-the-vips-memo/
Several folks from VIPS refused to sign that letter. One of the reasons was there's no proof that the data timing there were analyzing happened on the DNC servers. It's a giant flaw that forensic folks pointed out immediately when this first came out.
.....if the data was not on the DNC server on July 5, 2016, then none of this VIPS analysis matters (including the categorically stated fact that the local copy was acquired by an insider) and simply undermines the credibility of any and all analysis in the VIPS memo when joined with this flawed predicate.
Do you think the DOJ would have given different facts if they were sued by somebody else? This is ludicrous.
They didn't have to say anything about unmasking Devin Nunes story fell apart months ago.
which bring us to this
Oh my god. That's a good one.
Jem777 ago
You quoting NBC news or even Democrats and Republicans is the joke....you are taking a stand for the most incompetent, corrupt group of people. Not all but many and some are involved in child sex trafficking. Your continued excuses for them is laughable.
RweSure ago
Hi, with all due respect, you cited Dennis Montgomery as a source and then to back it up you cited Devin Nunes. And you don't even understand how funny this is.
You have no evidence of anyone in this thread being involved in child sex trafficking and you know it.
10401614? ago
Switching from one heavily-used-and-downvoted shill account to another heavily-used-and-downvoted shill account does not make your argument any more valid (especially when you don't even bother changing the name that much between the two accounts).
RweSure ago
Why do you think I did that, Einstein?
Jem777 ago
With all due respect you switched to RweSure from AreWeSure because you somehow think no one is catching on.
Your statement "no one in this thread is involved in child sex trafficking"
I again say you are not fooling anyone. Does HRC or Laura Silsby ring a bell.
With all due respect I know you miss DarkMath but I am not him. See ya
RweSure ago
No, I switched because I was not able to continue the conversation under RweSure. That's why my accounts are transparently the same person.
HRC is not involved in child trafficking. There's zero evidence of that. You do have me on Silsby, but again, HRC didn't know this woman before she went to Haiti and got arrested. Clinton only got involved because she was an American arrested overseas and that is the one of the duties of the State Department as I pointed out many, many times. https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/emergencies/arrest.html
10401625? ago
With all due respect, the cuck running the "Are We Sure" accounts doesn't deserve even a single ounce of respect.