Your position is incorrect. I wonder if you are sincere, or On The Job. Cheryl Hersha happens to be an impressive individual, an RN, who serves as guardian ad litem protecting children. She has a chip implanted by Jose Delgado which has become incarcerated in the bony structure of her skull and is quite clear in X-rays. She cannot be around ANY microwaves as they activate this antiquated chip and interfere with her bodily functions. I also know both of her co-authors, and they have both been attacked, as has Cheryl, for writing that book. That doesn't just HAPPEN. Secondly, your comment makes it seem that ANYONE who actually writes a book is automatically a FRAUD. I'm appalled that this should be your default reaction. It would make a lot more sense that you are just a lowly shill and not even trying very hard.
"?I also know both of her co-authors, and they have both been attacked, as has Cheryl, for writing that book. That doesn't just HAPPEN."
Of course it can! Many people are good at snuffing out FRAUDS. FRAUDS piss them off, so they ATTACK THEM.
If they're legit, then WHY THE DISCLAIMER? These sisters don't pass the smell test:
"Credibility collapses, as improbabilities are piled on inconsistencies, and the truth is buried beneath simplistic, pulp-adventure prose. In closing, the authors claim that "Their story is true," following with an admission that they found no government documents about the program or the sisters. An elaborate disclaimer about the "presumed thoughts and imagined words of the participants" will lead many readers to ponder just how much real events have been fictionalized."
In addition, many FRAUDS falsely claim to be ATTACKED. In the "conspiracy" realm, claiming that "a dark SUV tried to run me off the road!" gives them INSTANT "CREDIBILITY." That's why the ploy is used so often.
"Secondly, your comment makes it seem that ANYONE who actually writes a book is automatically a FRAUD."
Negative. I neither stated nor implied any such thing, especially since I hang out with authors and am writing a book myself.
" I'm appalled ..."
Of COURSE you are! This subforum is rife with fake "moral indignation," "outrage," and fingerwagging. You retards wouldn't have anything else to talk about if you weren't overreacting to some FALSE report without checking it out first. Just like you are doing right here, right now...
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
Anyone who has EVER encountered one of those people KNOWS they are total wrecks.
Further proof that book-peddling "whistleblowers" like Cheryl Hersha are 100%FRAUDS!!
FreeRebel ago
Your position is incorrect. I wonder if you are sincere, or On The Job. Cheryl Hersha happens to be an impressive individual, an RN, who serves as guardian ad litem protecting children. She has a chip implanted by Jose Delgado which has become incarcerated in the bony structure of her skull and is quite clear in X-rays. She cannot be around ANY microwaves as they activate this antiquated chip and interfere with her bodily functions. I also know both of her co-authors, and they have both been attacked, as has Cheryl, for writing that book. That doesn't just HAPPEN. Secondly, your comment makes it seem that ANYONE who actually writes a book is automatically a FRAUD. I'm appalled that this should be your default reaction. It would make a lot more sense that you are just a lowly shill and not even trying very hard.
equineluvr ago
"?I also know both of her co-authors, and they have both been attacked, as has Cheryl, for writing that book. That doesn't just HAPPEN."
Of course it can! Many people are good at snuffing out FRAUDS. FRAUDS piss them off, so they ATTACK THEM.
If they're legit, then WHY THE DISCLAIMER? These sisters don't pass the smell test:
"Credibility collapses, as improbabilities are piled on inconsistencies, and the truth is buried beneath simplistic, pulp-adventure prose. In closing, the authors claim that "Their story is true," following with an admission that they found no government documents about the program or the sisters. An elaborate disclaimer about the "presumed thoughts and imagined words of the participants" will lead many readers to ponder just how much real events have been fictionalized."
In addition, many FRAUDS falsely claim to be ATTACKED. In the "conspiracy" realm, claiming that "a dark SUV tried to run me off the road!" gives them INSTANT "CREDIBILITY." That's why the ploy is used so often.
"Secondly, your comment makes it seem that ANYONE who actually writes a book is automatically a FRAUD."
Negative. I neither stated nor implied any such thing, especially since I hang out with authors and am writing a book myself.
" I'm appalled ..."
Of COURSE you are! This subforum is rife with fake "moral indignation," "outrage," and fingerwagging. You retards wouldn't have anything else to talk about if you weren't overreacting to some FALSE report without checking it out first. Just like you are doing right here, right now...