I know I haven't been here for ages, and apologies if this creepshow was already posted (not popping up in search).
Remember this Wikileaks email, where Pedosta cited "leverage" over Bernie, lest he dare criticize the Clintons?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397
WELL. I found this and it turned my damn stomach. Cue a Vermont Freeman op-ed that isn't the notorious "rape essay" (near the end of it).
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2157415-sanders-revolution.html
"In Vermont, at a state beach, a mother is reprimanded by Authority for allowing her 6 month old daughter to go about without her diapers on. Now, if children go around naked, they are liable to see each others sexual organs, and maybe even touch them. Terrible thing! If we bring children up like this it will probably ruin the whole pornography business, not to mention the large segment of the general economy which makes its money by playing on peoples sexual frustrations."
SICK SICK SICK.
I know there at least WERE a few other "ex-Berners" and current "Bernie bros" helping here, so I'm sorry. But having been one myself, I couldn't ignore something like this. We aren't the blind worshippers Hillbots are. Perhaps there is some reasonable explanation, but this seems pretty damn hard to explain away.
view the rest of the comments →
Rmm ago
I'm not a Bernie fan , but in his defense, I believe the comment was being made sardonically. --In other words, I think he's making a dig at the phony people who by their "authority" make a mother put clothes on the 6 year old, and then perhaps enjoy porn and/or suffer from other sexual neuroses. He's contrasting the innocence of a little child unclothed at the beach(perfectly acceptable over in europe) with the knowing violation of children used in the pornindustry. (I hope anyway)
carmencita ago
Thank you for posting that. That is how it should be read. Objectively, Not through a Political Lens. I will now post something I posted a couple months ago when we went through the same kind of slamming and misinformation that many have read and learned from the conservative sites that will slam anyone that is running against their candidate. Just as WaPo ran many articles against Bernie. Here is my Comment:
You heard, you did not research this before spreading that? Please research. Again you are wrong about the 6M dollar house. Please research. Many are jumping on the trash Bernie band wagon because they are huge Trump supporters. I have never trashed Trump on here. I did not vote for him and many on here know that I have always said that I am willing to give him a chance. I don't think some are willing to do the same for Bernie. Please Read this link: Thanks. https://www.quora.com/Does-Bernie-Sanders-own-three-homes Also, the FBI Investigation was under Comey's reign and I add that Jane was trying to buy land owned by the Burlington Roman Catholic Diocese. Bishop Coyne who heads it was ordained at St John's Seminary in Boston Archdiocese, they are connected to the Jesuits. Need I say anymore? Here is info on Coyne if you need proof. http://www.vermontcatholic.org/index.php?sid=5&pid=936&subnav_id=103 @Zimpendingdoom @4TruthUnited @V____Z @Votescam
Da-Cat ago
There's some kind of shady sounding scandal about this Catholic church real estate deal still unresolved ATM.
carmencita ago
Yes. I agree. I think they are trying to Swiftboat Jane. In the thread someone brought up that he was threatened and bruises on the internet. Well, yes there was a pic of him that was immediately removed. I saw it on my phone and by the time I passed it to a friend it disappeared not to be found again. At least not by me. This was right before he was to be announced by Nina Turner who was immediately pulled from that and that the DNC called Bernie and told him she would not be doing it and that Tulsi Gabbard would be doing it. Nina Turner was to give a press conf. explaining what happened but she never appeared. Many were waiting for her including Danny Glover Susan Sarandon Josh Fox but she never showed up. Many supporters were watching for her and she did not appear. Hours later she appeared on MSNBC and spoke with a straight face, as though nothing had happened. I believe she was also threatened. They did not want her to appear because as a black woman she has a powerful message and voice. They did not want to give her the moment she would probably take to speak the real truth. Believe me, she would have veered off track and would have unleashed what they did not want to become unknown. Also, she would become a powerful possible black woman candidate for President. The First Black Woman President. Whoever thinks that Bernie was tainted is wrong imo, he and Nina were threatened. The gossip that went around from people staying at the same hotel was that a couple of thugs were seen on his floor and it is believed that he was roughed up after he answered the door. I believe as they roughed him up they also voiced some serious threats against Jane and or Family. This brings to mind our research during Seth Rich about the Unions that do work for the DNC and Friends. Now Again, this is all my own opinion. BTW, I was in Philly for the Convention.