I know I haven't been here for ages, and apologies if this creepshow was already posted (not popping up in search).
Remember this Wikileaks email, where Pedosta cited "leverage" over Bernie, lest he dare criticize the Clintons?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397
WELL. I found this and it turned my damn stomach. Cue a Vermont Freeman op-ed that isn't the notorious "rape essay" (near the end of it).
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2157415-sanders-revolution.html
"In Vermont, at a state beach, a mother is reprimanded by Authority for allowing her 6 month old daughter to go about without her diapers on. Now, if children go around naked, they are liable to see each others sexual organs, and maybe even touch them. Terrible thing! If we bring children up like this it will probably ruin the whole pornography business, not to mention the large segment of the general economy which makes its money by playing on peoples sexual frustrations."
SICK SICK SICK.
I know there at least WERE a few other "ex-Berners" and current "Bernie bros" helping here, so I'm sorry. But having been one myself, I couldn't ignore something like this. We aren't the blind worshippers Hillbots are. Perhaps there is some reasonable explanation, but this seems pretty damn hard to explain away.
view the rest of the comments →
Rmm ago
I'm not a Bernie fan , but in his defense, I believe the comment was being made sardonically. --In other words, I think he's making a dig at the phony people who by their "authority" make a mother put clothes on the 6 year old, and then perhaps enjoy porn and/or suffer from other sexual neuroses. He's contrasting the innocence of a little child unclothed at the beach(perfectly acceptable over in europe) with the knowing violation of children used in the pornindustry. (I hope anyway)
Verite1 ago
Agreed! I think he was being sarcastic like he often is! Accusation that Bernie is a pedophile is absurd.