You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

RweSure ago

Hi, Are_we-sure. If you'll notice, I didn't actually say, "The Secret Service is covering up a Trump assassination attempt." That's your own conclusion.

What I am saying is that the official narrative is highly questionable.

You're pushing a conspiracy theory....the soft version of "Just asking questions?" Or "something doesn't add up." First off you use the conspiracy phrase "official narrative" which as I'm sure you know activates people's SpideySense around here. And here's what that narrative is

But instead they were surrounded by Secret Service agents, who they say combed their car for anything dangerous. They found no threat, confirmed their brakes went out and let them go. The Springfield police chief says there was no mal-intent.

The Secret Service confirmed this was a case where the brakes went out on a car.

Why is this dubious? Why is a "narrative" instead of what happened? Do you feel the Secret Service is incompetent and couldn't determine if the brakes were not working on the car?

You claim it's dubious and you point to a highly biased and edited video calling it an assassination attempt. Why is your narrative not the dubious one? What are you claiming about the Secret Service?

Why is your conspiracy theory not the dubious one?

Why is it not dubious that you question the Springfield Chief of Police? You have no evidence. You have GOOGLE MAPS, FOR GOODNESS'S SAKES. How do you think that makes you more qualified to understand what happened that the people ACTUALLY ON SITE? You're a smart man, surely, if you took the time to stop and think, you would understand the difference between looking a map and being at the location. Wouldn't you? I would hope you would. After all this location, these woods, that road would one that police department of Springfield, Missouri would be very familiar with.

If her claim is false, which I HIGHLY SUSPECT it is

Your evidence is basically your suspicion. That's it. You really have nothing else. You have your suspicion and some belief that the Secret Service and the Springfield police know less about this situation than you do because you saw a video and looked at Google Maps.

First off, you are posted a edited conspiracy video of the event that calls it an assassination attempt with zero evidence. When evidence of what occurred is presented, you discount this evidence and claim this is possible sabotage and an ambush. Even though the car never makes an attempt to drive onto the highway.

If you wanted to find out what happened, the first thing to do would be to try to get a better sense of the event by finding the original unedited video. The video you show is NOT from the person who filmed the event. How do we know? The video has a LiveLeak logo on it, meaning the guy on youtube stole it from LiveLeak, not downloaded it from his camera. The man who shot this footage is named Clayte, not Clayton.

Here's the original footage with the audio of those filming and no edits. http://forums.liveleak.com/showthread.php?t=120228

Edit: found Clayte Hefner's channel on youtube and he's also pushing a bad intentions narrative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yqa5PUViPo

(BTW I love, love, love, the clickbait headline

Vehicle attempts to ram Presidential Motorcade in Springfield, MO

Followed by the disclaimer he put up afterwards trying to cover his ass from a libel lawsuit.

This video is for entertainment purposes only, and is in no way meant to accuse the driver and/or passenger )

Let's example the conspiracy that the car was intentionally threaten the president motorcade?

Why moving so slow? Why no attempt to actually make it on the road?

The other angle makes it clear the car is going much, much slower than the cars on the highway AND it makes clear the car turns away from the highway