It sounds like a trap set to ridicule feeble-minded conspiracy theorists and aspiring anti-semite school boys. The parody is obvious! Of course, the usual/useful shills and imbeciles fell straight into it.
Blood libel is too serious of a problem to be left to morons. For authentic, thoroughly documented historical information on kabbalistique children's sacrifice, refer to Prof. Ariel Toaff's seminal "Blood Easter" (Pasqua di Sangue). Toaff, who is a jewish Italian historian and son of a rabbi himself, started his research in the hope to debunk the blood libel "myth". He was quite shoked by what he discovered. Needless to say, he came under heavy criticism from (((academia))) and zionists worldwide. After trying to defend his findings, he eventually recanted, apologized and republished a cleansed, kosher version of the book. I believe a PDF of the English translated original 1st edition could still be found online.
"Toaff wrote that these critics had misunderstood his book, which argued that the ritual use of small quantities of dried blood in magical curses had been a real practice among medieval "Ashkenazi extremists", but that this was unrelated to the accusation of ritual murder which was the central claim of blood libel"
Looks like youre the kikeshill. That was obvious from your agreeing with a mod. NOBODY THOUGHT THIS WAS AN ACTUAL MARKETED PRODUCT, IT SAYS MOCKING RIGHT IN THE TITLE
Yes, the 1st edition does, though carefully. Keep in mind it's an academic work, written by a Jewish scholar. Regardless, it's a very readable and well researched book.
view the rest of the comments →
ArmedExorcist ago
It sounds like a trap set to ridicule feeble-minded conspiracy theorists and aspiring anti-semite school boys. The parody is obvious! Of course, the usual/useful shills and imbeciles fell straight into it. Blood libel is too serious of a problem to be left to morons. For authentic, thoroughly documented historical information on kabbalistique children's sacrifice, refer to Prof. Ariel Toaff's seminal "Blood Easter" (Pasqua di Sangue). Toaff, who is a jewish Italian historian and son of a rabbi himself, started his research in the hope to debunk the blood libel "myth". He was quite shoked by what he discovered. Needless to say, he came under heavy criticism from (((academia))) and zionists worldwide. After trying to defend his findings, he eventually recanted, apologized and republished a cleansed, kosher version of the book. I believe a PDF of the English translated original 1st edition could still be found online.
LongDongKeyhote ago
"Toaff wrote that these critics had misunderstood his book, which argued that the ritual use of small quantities of dried blood in magical curses had been a real practice among medieval "Ashkenazi extremists", but that this was unrelated to the accusation of ritual murder which was the central claim of blood libel"
Looks like youre the kikeshill. That was obvious from your agreeing with a mod. NOBODY THOUGHT THIS WAS AN ACTUAL MARKETED PRODUCT, IT SAYS MOCKING RIGHT IN THE TITLE
Shagaroth ago
Is the Toaff book worth reading? Does it support the claims of Blood libel?
ArmedExorcist ago
Yes, the 1st edition does, though carefully. Keep in mind it's an academic work, written by a Jewish scholar. Regardless, it's a very readable and well researched book.