For all you Jungians out there I have a few words. Yes he did appear as if he was differentiating himself from Freud but was he? Look a little deeper.
Dr. Carl Jung was actually a double agent working for the OSS (CIA) Dulles. He would get the wealthy (almost always female) to tell him their strories through Analysis and then feed that info to Dulles if the CIA.
His history is very well hidden. Not saying he is the monster Freud was but their is a sanitized version of him for a reason. I knew someone who was a personal confidant and can prove it.
Honestly I was a fan of Jung before researching this. But his connection to Tavistock, which is publicly available information, changed my mind.
I still don't feel he was the monster that Freud was - but this entire area needs more research.
Yes I agree. When you realize what Tavistock does and is then you begin to understand what we have been allowed to know of Jung is missing something. How can Tavistock have a statue if that monster Freud still today when Jung was around much longer and allegedly completely disagreed with his teaching which were being implemented at Tavistock.
Because Jung wasn't all about sex. Freud was a pervert. That's the hidden bit. Jung pissed off because he couldn't deal with Freud and his inner circle any longer. Jung was also heterosexual...unlike Freud.
view the rest of the comments →
Jem777 ago
For all you Jungians out there I have a few words. Yes he did appear as if he was differentiating himself from Freud but was he? Look a little deeper.
Dr. Carl Jung was actually a double agent working for the OSS (CIA) Dulles. He would get the wealthy (almost always female) to tell him their strories through Analysis and then feed that info to Dulles if the CIA.
His history is very well hidden. Not saying he is the monster Freud was but their is a sanitized version of him for a reason. I knew someone who was a personal confidant and can prove it.
What @9217 wrote is correct.
9217 ago
Honestly I was a fan of Jung before researching this. But his connection to Tavistock, which is publicly available information, changed my mind. I still don't feel he was the monster that Freud was - but this entire area needs more research.
Jem777 ago
Yes I agree. When you realize what Tavistock does and is then you begin to understand what we have been allowed to know of Jung is missing something. How can Tavistock have a statue if that monster Freud still today when Jung was around much longer and allegedly completely disagreed with his teaching which were being implemented at Tavistock.
cantsleepawink ago
Because Jung wasn't all about sex. Freud was a pervert. That's the hidden bit. Jung pissed off because he couldn't deal with Freud and his inner circle any longer. Jung was also heterosexual...unlike Freud.