This, this is the kinda shit I'm talking about with "betrayal", not that I can personally verify this to be true... but, if it is, what the absolute fuck?
How does a move like this actually help us?
Sure, a thought that crossed my mind is, "maybe a deal has been struck, that will have Arpaio give up the names of his handlers", but, this seems like a convenient little lollipop to keep us happy a little while longer, supposing it were to be the reason behind the pardon; I'm curious as to how you(and others who are confident in Trump) view a move like this, supposing that it's true.
If it isn't true that Trump has pardoned a pedo enabler, please help debunk the issue, not just for my own sake but for anyone else who might be very confused by Trump's apparent behavior/decisions.
For starters.the author Rachel Blevins is an anti-Trumper. She sorta reminds me of the people at Snopes. She has an agenda, but she is not going to be obvious about it. Can you find some early history on her?
First impression is to agree with you - there's a clear anti-trump message in her article but she hides it between the non-partisan chatter about (essentially) the deep state; mixing fact with fiction? Red herring 101
Second impression: Not so sure she's specifically anti-trump, seems to rattle off all the talking points of someone who's actually trying to hold 'all sides' accountable for their bullshit, not unlike we're trying to do here.
Could be that there's something to the Arpaio thing, or that she herself has been caught up in a ploy, or that she is complicit in a plot to take down Trump - but, I'm not seeing much from her that really strikes me as an effort to attack Trump only.
Second impression: Not so sure she's specifically anti-trump, seems to rattle off all the talking points of someone who's actually trying to hold 'all sides' accountable for their bullshit, not unlike we're trying to do here.
As I said earlier. where is her history during the Obama ADm. She has nothing!!!!! But sweetholymosiah she is anti-corruption when Trump is in office.
MediaMattersGoogleFacebookObama have been busy scrubbing.
Very valid point! Though, she does make a jab at Obama in her article about presidential tweets, it's so fleeting that she may as well have left it out, without affecting her article.
view the rest of the comments →
argosciv ago
@LA_Trump
This, this is the kinda shit I'm talking about with "betrayal", not that I can personally verify this to be true... but, if it is, what the absolute fuck?
How does a move like this actually help us?
Sure, a thought that crossed my mind is, "maybe a deal has been struck, that will have Arpaio give up the names of his handlers", but, this seems like a convenient little lollipop to keep us happy a little while longer, supposing it were to be the reason behind the pardon; I'm curious as to how you(and others who are confident in Trump) view a move like this, supposing that it's true.
If it isn't true that Trump has pardoned a pedo enabler, please help debunk the issue, not just for my own sake but for anyone else who might be very confused by Trump's apparent behavior/decisions.
Commoner ago
For starters.the author Rachel Blevins is an anti-Trumper. She sorta reminds me of the people at Snopes. She has an agenda, but she is not going to be obvious about it. Can you find some early history on her?
https://rachelblevins.com/2017/08/26/this-collection-of-trumps-tweets-contradicting-themselves-proves-us-presidents-are-puppets/
argosciv ago
I'll have a look, thanks.
First impression is to agree with you - there's a clear anti-trump message in her article but she hides it between the non-partisan chatter about (essentially) the deep state; mixing fact with fiction? Red herring 101
Second impression: Not so sure she's specifically anti-trump, seems to rattle off all the talking points of someone who's actually trying to hold 'all sides' accountable for their bullshit, not unlike we're trying to do here.
Could be that there's something to the Arpaio thing, or that she herself has been caught up in a ploy, or that she is complicit in a plot to take down Trump - but, I'm not seeing much from her that really strikes me as an effort to attack Trump only.
Commoner ago
As I said earlier. where is her history during the Obama ADm. She has nothing!!!!! But sweetholymosiah she is anti-corruption when Trump is in office.
MediaMattersGoogleFacebookObama have been busy scrubbing.
argosciv ago
I see what you did there ;)
Very valid point! Though, she does make a jab at Obama in her article about presidential tweets, it's so fleeting that she may as well have left it out, without affecting her article.