Bad sensationalist title for the article. I'm not saying this is a good thing, but the inaccurate title dilutes the message. VS has nothing to do with it. Not all lingerie shows are Victoria Secret. Not all sexy (not the right word for clothes on a 5 year old, but I can't think of a better one) lingerie is VS. The article is written like something off cracked or buzzfeed. I'm not searching for verification to support the article, but the writing style, and journalism style point to CNN level fact checking.
What the fuck are you talking about? I said they are hosting a Victorias Secret style lingerie show for children. "I'm not searching for verification to support the article" It takes a second to look at this and think what the fuck. Jesus you shills come out of the damn woodwork
view the rest of the comments →
RandomGoater ago
Bad sensationalist title for the article. I'm not saying this is a good thing, but the inaccurate title dilutes the message. VS has nothing to do with it. Not all lingerie shows are Victoria Secret. Not all sexy (not the right word for clothes on a 5 year old, but I can't think of a better one) lingerie is VS. The article is written like something off cracked or buzzfeed. I'm not searching for verification to support the article, but the writing style, and journalism style point to CNN level fact checking.
gamepwn ago
What the fuck are you talking about? I said they are hosting a Victorias Secret style lingerie show for children. "I'm not searching for verification to support the article" It takes a second to look at this and think what the fuck. Jesus you shills come out of the damn woodwork
argosciv ago
I'd honestly have to agree with Random, that the DailyMail article is written like utter shit.
But, that doesn't take away from the story being told in either.
http://cdn1.collective-evolution.com/assets/uploads/2017/08/ped1.jpg
If that's not enough to set off alarm bells, aside from the outfits themselves, I dunno wtf is.