From the comments, thank you!
"darkknight111 1 points (+1|-0) 3 hours ago"
"This is a RICO lawsuit. RICO is a special case of civil lawsuit. Evidence can be obtained from across state lines. In addition, it is possible for RICO to be upgraded from a civil case to a criminal case depending on what kind of evidence gets found.
RICO is what gets used to take down organized crime. RICO is intentionally designed to be vague so as to take down mobsters even if a smoking gun can't be found."
Gregory Ackers filed a complaint on August 14th 2017 for a civil suit, *possibly leading to a future indictment of Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jennifer Palmeri, Donna Brazile, CNN, Time Warner, and the Democratic National Committee for collusion and racketeering to mislead voaters and to put Bernie Sanders at a disadvantage in the 2016 presidential election.
Please sign up for pacemonitor.com to view official document or see PDF
Implementing RICO act
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Presiding Judge Steven C. Jones, United States District Court, GA
Justia Docket
This case includes all the familiar faces of the wikileaks emails, Hillary body count, and the pizzagate scandal. Once this case is completely filed, Ackers case *could become an indictment, and further, could include a Superseding Indictment after Discovery to bring more charges of possible Pizzagate/Pedogate involvement. EDIT: (Still pending a conversation with Greg, sent an email 8/25/17)
ALLUSIONS TO PIZZAGATE IN THE PRESS
On the same day this suit was filed, Republican Paul Nehlen, who lost to Paul Ryan, tells Associated Press that he believes that Pizzagate is real
Also reported by Chicago Tribune and many other news outlets.
Again, on the same day, LA Times posted a story about Trump retweeting a tweet by Jack Prosobiec, "an alt-right media figure who pushed the PizzaGate and Seth Rich conspiracy theories"
LA Times Youtube Video
I believe we need to read between the lines that many in high level positions are getting ready to bring the elite pedophile ring down and the only way they can do this is through a *MAJOR INDICTMENT process started by Gregory Ackers' suit.
Remember the Dennis Hastert case
“Nothing is more stunning than having 'serial child molester' and ' speaker of the House' in the same sentence.”
Hastert was brought to justice on FRAUD Charges... not great, but it was something, and the judge acknowledged it for the world to hear. Let's hope to see justice in this complaint for indictment.
UPDATE
Civil Suit Granted.
"The requirements of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) are thus satisfied, and Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in
District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [1] is GRANTED."
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/24/ackers-granted-civil-case/
*EDITS were made on this post from the original to further clarify the difference between a possible Indictment and Civil Suit. Thank you for everyone's involvement in peer reviewing this post to make it more accurate! I am not a lawyer, so getting feedback from those who understand the law and its terms is very much appreciated.
view the rest of the comments →
ArmedExorcist ago
This is what I would do if I were Hillary: hire/convince/lure some diagnosed or certifiable nutcase into filing a lawsuit against her. Get it dismissed within hours as frivolous and then proclaim loudly, wether asked or not about it, that 1) the Courts have established she's innocent; 2) anyone trying to raise the issue of her responsibility/crimes/guilt, or to file charges against her is at least as batshit crazy as that guy Akers.
cantsleepawink ago
Upvoat for you.
Honeybee_ ago
And thank you for looking into this more, THIS is why I love Voat, peer reviewed information and REAL discussion, it's the only way to get to the truth. I wrote to Greg Ackers and I'm hoping for a phone call today, it is really bizarre that most of his previous addresses where Community Centers and Homeless Shelters, could he be a homeless guy? It seems counterintuitive given the wording and persistance in getting these people in an actual court setting. Hope we can get his side of the story. Also look in to the PAC he created "Democrats for Trump" it was listed on his Google + page. Not sure where the Bounty website came from, any info on how that relates to Greg? Just want to see the evidence he set up that website. Truth On ♡
cantsleepawink ago
I think he got help with the court documentation. He has a couple of lawyers on his Facebook page. But that's the puzzle for me. He does appear to be homeless and has moved between Texas and LA over the last few years. However, he has some very prominent names as friends on his FB account. Doesn't make sense. Unless he flattered some of those people by asking to make a film with them because that is what he seems to do. However, I have never seen anyone respond to his overtures.
He does seem to be very political..here's another example: http://archive.is/wyEpj
Btw, have you seen he was noticed by Stratfor back in 2012? He's in the wikileaks. I just posted a link in one of my last comments here. https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/99/995290_re-8-24-.html
Honeybee_ ago
Wow I'm just thinking, stay with me, this might be a long shot... BUT If you've made the ultimate sacrifice to jail these muther f-ers, and don't want to have to keep paying filing fees, you would remain homeless, for to actually be granted 28 U.S.C 1915 (1)(a) you have to prove you really can't afford to pay file fees, but have good reason to file. Thoughts?
cantsleepawink ago
Yes, I initially thought that was a possibility. But having gone through his emails I think that he is not mentally well and his education is of a certain standard. He is definitely a political animal. The question is did he file those court documents himself? And if he did not, who helped him and why?
Iyd10 ago
This complaint doesn't look professional at all. From the layout, formatting and punctuation errors to the arguments themselves. It's not even on pleading paper. No lawyer would write this.
Honeybee_ ago
Very good questions