From the comments, thank you!
"darkknight111 1 points (+1|-0) 3 hours ago"
"This is a RICO lawsuit. RICO is a special case of civil lawsuit. Evidence can be obtained from across state lines. In addition, it is possible for RICO to be upgraded from a civil case to a criminal case depending on what kind of evidence gets found.
RICO is what gets used to take down organized crime. RICO is intentionally designed to be vague so as to take down mobsters even if a smoking gun can't be found."
Gregory Ackers filed a complaint on August 14th 2017 for a civil suit, *possibly leading to a future indictment of Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jennifer Palmeri, Donna Brazile, CNN, Time Warner, and the Democratic National Committee for collusion and racketeering to mislead voaters and to put Bernie Sanders at a disadvantage in the 2016 presidential election.
Please sign up for pacemonitor.com to view official document or see PDF
Implementing RICO act
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Presiding Judge Steven C. Jones, United States District Court, GA
Justia Docket
This case includes all the familiar faces of the wikileaks emails, Hillary body count, and the pizzagate scandal. Once this case is completely filed, Ackers case *could become an indictment, and further, could include a Superseding Indictment after Discovery to bring more charges of possible Pizzagate/Pedogate involvement. EDIT: (Still pending a conversation with Greg, sent an email 8/25/17)
ALLUSIONS TO PIZZAGATE IN THE PRESS
On the same day this suit was filed, Republican Paul Nehlen, who lost to Paul Ryan, tells Associated Press that he believes that Pizzagate is real
Also reported by Chicago Tribune and many other news outlets.
Again, on the same day, LA Times posted a story about Trump retweeting a tweet by Jack Prosobiec, "an alt-right media figure who pushed the PizzaGate and Seth Rich conspiracy theories"
LA Times Youtube Video
I believe we need to read between the lines that many in high level positions are getting ready to bring the elite pedophile ring down and the only way they can do this is through a *MAJOR INDICTMENT process started by Gregory Ackers' suit.
Remember the Dennis Hastert case
“Nothing is more stunning than having 'serial child molester' and ' speaker of the House' in the same sentence.”
Hastert was brought to justice on FRAUD Charges... not great, but it was something, and the judge acknowledged it for the world to hear. Let's hope to see justice in this complaint for indictment.
UPDATE
Civil Suit Granted.
"The requirements of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) are thus satisfied, and Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in
District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [1] is GRANTED."
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/24/ackers-granted-civil-case/
*EDITS were made on this post from the original to further clarify the difference between a possible Indictment and Civil Suit. Thank you for everyone's involvement in peer reviewing this post to make it more accurate! I am not a lawyer, so getting feedback from those who understand the law and its terms is very much appreciated.
view the rest of the comments →
SoldierofLight ago
Am I understanding this correctly that it's a CIVIL suit, and not a CRIMINAL suit? As in, if it's not thrown out of court, the defendants can simply and quietly settle out of court for an undisclosed sum of money and not do any jail time at all?
cantsleepawink ago
This is his twitter: https://twitter.com/GREGANCHORS/with_replies and from the other bits and pieces that I've seen I'm afraid this case may not get very far.
starseed_empath ago
What exactly proves this is his twitter, aside from the name?
cantsleepawink ago
That's a good question. It could be someone pretending to be him. Ackers though does seem to be a documentary filmmaker or has aspirations to be one. His Facebook account has similar posts where he is trying to contact others and asking to collaborate on films. If you google his yahoo email address you will see other examples where he does the same. Public records of his address, which is also stated on the court documents, tie in with his Facebook account. So the Twitter account profile does tie in with the other bits and pieces that we know about him. However, there is no verification that the Twitter account is definitely him. I did not want to post a link to any other social media accounts because I think people can go find that if they want and I personally find that quite intrusive. FB, for example, shows links to other accounts. Twitter is less intrusive (imo).