Yes. Months ago I found MASONIC SYMBOLISM on his LinkedIn page plus tons of Jew N (globalist) language in the Bank of Joy info.page and posted it here.
Again? Those dots on his LinkedIn are NOT Masonic (as I have said numerous times on different threads here) - I also said I can't share THEIR ACTUAL MEANING before August but some days ago I have updated the thread accordingly.
And this was his reply concerning those dots:
I’m not connected to, or belonging to a religion, club, movement or organisation other than United People and its projects. I’m not belonging to the Freemasons. The 3 dots behind my B. represent: 1. The creator of heaven and earth 2. His first born son and 3. The virtuous holy spirit.
But hell, don't take my word for it - just contact him yourself and ask.
Yeah, and maybe it's just because of his religious views? I haven't seen a single interview with him where he hasn't talked about this. He seems pretty into his beliefs.
I could be wrong but the language used by Ronald and his peers on his website, Youtube channels and published articles is very reminiscent of the way Tavistock and Esalen type institutes use language. It's like a formula. Coupled with his new bank that he is trying to start up and the mantra that we are 'all one' and unified we will start a new world...just invest in his bank. Of course, it is plausible for an individual to really be trying to create change in this world that desperately needs it.
But, Ronald seems to be trying to hit all the buttons ...pedophilia, 2012, the banking system. I'm especially wary when someone talks about starting a new currency. How many different groups now are trying to do this ?
You don't need to agree. I'm just voicing my own disquiet.
Could you give a few examples of language that you find reminiscent of Tavistock and whatnot type language? By the way, Ronald wrote only about 3 or 4 articles on that "Familieblij" website and everything else is by other people.
What I personally find a little weird to be honest is that some time ago the anti-campaigns against him were usually based on "I don't believe he was ever close to these elite circles, he is making that all up" while now a fair share of these same people now point out an (alleged) Freemason being in the advisory board of his bank project - now, I wonder how he got into contact with someone like this if he wasn't close to these circles?
Make up your minds, please...?
Then I wonder in general why all the hate and hostility towards him? No one is obligated to believe him, no one is obligated to support his bank project. He actually is on OUR side pointing out that pizzagate and everything connected IS REAL. So, I wonder who are these people who try to discredit him (now they can't murder him right under our noses without validating everything he said, can they...)? No fuckin' way they don't have a very shady agenda of their own. I am talking about the initiators (Martin Vrijland for example) here, by the way, not the ignorant masses simply repeating what they say.
He actually is on OUR side pointing out that pizzagate and everything connected IS REAL.
Because he's pointing out things that have been discussed now for months if not years does not automatically mean that he is on 'our side'. You're new to this, aren't you?
If you don't mind me saying so (and even if you do), you're pretty demanding of my time with your reqeuest for more examples. I suggest you use the Voat search feature and search for Tavistock to find the plethora of posts including those I have authored, to familiarise yourself with their brand of psychoanalytical language that is also used in NLP, which is a mechanism for mass public manipulation used by politicians and people who work in advertising, PR, and the media, as well as salesmen, magicians, hypnotists, mentalists and anyone else interested in influencing people.
Or, you could just join Ronald's World Cookie Foundation Movementhttp://archive.is/d5ZVX(The original link is on his Linkedin profile)
Because he's pointing out things that have been discussed now for months if not years does not automatically mean that he is on 'our side'.
That's not what I meant. I mean if he was more like: "this and that happened to me and I was within these circles but pizzagate is completely blown out of proportion so don't pay any attention to that".
You're new to this, aren't you?
Why, because I don't spend half my day in this subverse?
If you don't mind me saying so (and even if you do), you're pretty demanding of my time with your reqeuest for more examples.
Well, you claimed something and now I am "demanding" if I want some examples for your claims? Are you serious? But well, kinda telling that statement if you don't mind me saying so.
Or, you could just join Ronald's World Cookie Foundation Movement http://archive.is/d5ZVX (The original link is on his Linkedin profile)
And I am already aware of that, thank you very much. And if you read the description of that foundation you would see it's not that different from their "declaration of human rights" on the United People website. But strange name - instant disqualification, right?
But hey, I already kinda said it in my last posting but let me repeat that for you - don't believe him? Fine, don't. But why waste so much time on someone/something you disagree with? Unless you have an agenda of your own no real reason comes to mind. Interestingly, for some reason spending so much time on discrediting Ronald and his bank project seems not too demanding of your time. But providing some examples I explicitly asked for? Oh noes.
But why waste so much time on someone/something you disagree with?
I made one post on him to share my thoughts and findings on him. and a couple of comments elsewhere that took all of 10 seconds. Any other time is spent responding to people like yourself who want to know more. I wrote about him because I believe in critical thinking and bringing balance to the forum. I don't like to see people being led into traps or off a cliff. It doesn't help the 'cause' of Truth.
As for you, the moment brings in the word 'agenda' and lobs it at me like a weapon I say tah dah. Because I know what your game is.
We don't have to agree. That's the fab thing about Voat. Tah dah.
I don't like to see people being led into traps or off a cliff. It doesn't help the 'cause' of Truth.
See, that's the problem here - none of you can actually prove that it's a "trap" people are led into.
Because I know what your game is.
And what might that be?
I can actually prove that I am not affiliated with Ronald, his bank project, United People and whatnot else. But you sound suspiciously like Vrijland and all the other shills who interestingly popped up almost at the same time enganging in their (pardon my language) mental circle jerk spread over various blogs/youtube/facebook/whatnot.
The only ones actually profiting from the discord this causes are the elites themselves. Makes you wonder, doesn't it...
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
Yes. Months ago I found MASONIC SYMBOLISM on his LinkedIn page plus tons of Jew N (globalist) language in the Bank of Joy info.page and posted it here.
purpleabyss ago
Again? Those dots on his LinkedIn are NOT Masonic (as I have said numerous times on different threads here) - I also said I can't share THEIR ACTUAL MEANING before August but some days ago I have updated the thread accordingly.
And this was his reply concerning those dots:
I’m not connected to, or belonging to a religion, club, movement or organisation other than United People and its projects. I’m not belonging to the Freemasons. The 3 dots behind my B. represent: 1. The creator of heaven and earth 2. His first born son and 3. The virtuous holy spirit.
But hell, don't take my word for it - just contact him yourself and ask.
cantsleepawink ago
'In the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.' Catholic, Jesuit sounds like to me.
Fits in with his ties to Malta.
purpleabyss ago
Yeah, and maybe it's just because of his religious views? I haven't seen a single interview with him where he hasn't talked about this. He seems pretty into his beliefs.
Check this link: short essay about god written by him, dated 2010
Doesn't sound very Catholic (= dogmatic) if you ask me.
cantsleepawink ago
Check out this page: http://www.familieblij.nl/page27.php from 2009
Seems he's been around for a while - at least a a presence in the Netherlands - and he's either not completely 'all there' or he's into forming cults.
purpleabyss ago
That article you linked to wasn't written by him ("© Rick Devente"). Besides, is any group of likeminded people a cult in your eyes?
cantsleepawink ago
I didn't notice that the article was written by someone else. Thanks.
There are certain elements of that particular group of people that do seem reminiscent of cult-like behaviour.
No.
purpleabyss ago
You're welcome.
Like what?
cantsleepawink ago
I could be wrong but the language used by Ronald and his peers on his website, Youtube channels and published articles is very reminiscent of the way Tavistock and Esalen type institutes use language. It's like a formula. Coupled with his new bank that he is trying to start up and the mantra that we are 'all one' and unified we will start a new world...just invest in his bank. Of course, it is plausible for an individual to really be trying to create change in this world that desperately needs it.
But, Ronald seems to be trying to hit all the buttons ...pedophilia, 2012, the banking system. I'm especially wary when someone talks about starting a new currency. How many different groups now are trying to do this ?
You don't need to agree. I'm just voicing my own disquiet.
purpleabyss ago
Could you give a few examples of language that you find reminiscent of Tavistock and whatnot type language? By the way, Ronald wrote only about 3 or 4 articles on that "Familieblij" website and everything else is by other people.
What I personally find a little weird to be honest is that some time ago the anti-campaigns against him were usually based on "I don't believe he was ever close to these elite circles, he is making that all up" while now a fair share of these same people now point out an (alleged) Freemason being in the advisory board of his bank project - now, I wonder how he got into contact with someone like this if he wasn't close to these circles?
Make up your minds, please...?
Then I wonder in general why all the hate and hostility towards him? No one is obligated to believe him, no one is obligated to support his bank project. He actually is on OUR side pointing out that pizzagate and everything connected IS REAL. So, I wonder who are these people who try to discredit him (now they can't murder him right under our noses without validating everything he said, can they...)? No fuckin' way they don't have a very shady agenda of their own. I am talking about the initiators (Martin Vrijland for example) here, by the way, not the ignorant masses simply repeating what they say.
cantsleepawink ago
Because he's pointing out things that have been discussed now for months if not years does not automatically mean that he is on 'our side'. You're new to this, aren't you?
If you don't mind me saying so (and even if you do), you're pretty demanding of my time with your reqeuest for more examples. I suggest you use the Voat search feature and search for Tavistock to find the plethora of posts including those I have authored, to familiarise yourself with their brand of psychoanalytical language that is also used in NLP, which is a mechanism for mass public manipulation used by politicians and people who work in advertising, PR, and the media, as well as salesmen, magicians, hypnotists, mentalists and anyone else interested in influencing people.
Or, you could just join Ronald's World Cookie Foundation Movement http://archive.is/d5ZVX (The original link is on his Linkedin profile)
purpleabyss ago
That's not what I meant. I mean if he was more like: "this and that happened to me and I was within these circles but pizzagate is completely blown out of proportion so don't pay any attention to that".
Why, because I don't spend half my day in this subverse?
Well, you claimed something and now I am "demanding" if I want some examples for your claims? Are you serious? But well, kinda telling that statement if you don't mind me saying so.
And I am already aware of that, thank you very much. And if you read the description of that foundation you would see it's not that different from their "declaration of human rights" on the United People website. But strange name - instant disqualification, right?
But hey, I already kinda said it in my last posting but let me repeat that for you - don't believe him? Fine, don't. But why waste so much time on someone/something you disagree with? Unless you have an agenda of your own no real reason comes to mind. Interestingly, for some reason spending so much time on discrediting Ronald and his bank project seems not too demanding of your time. But providing some examples I explicitly asked for? Oh noes.
cantsleepawink ago
I made one post on him to share my thoughts and findings on him. and a couple of comments elsewhere that took all of 10 seconds. Any other time is spent responding to people like yourself who want to know more. I wrote about him because I believe in critical thinking and bringing balance to the forum. I don't like to see people being led into traps or off a cliff. It doesn't help the 'cause' of Truth.
As for you, the moment brings in the word 'agenda' and lobs it at me like a weapon I say tah dah. Because I know what your game is.
We don't have to agree. That's the fab thing about Voat. Tah dah.
purpleabyss ago
See, that's the problem here - none of you can actually prove that it's a "trap" people are led into.
And what might that be?
I can actually prove that I am not affiliated with Ronald, his bank project, United People and whatnot else. But you sound suspiciously like Vrijland and all the other shills who interestingly popped up almost at the same time enganging in their (pardon my language) mental circle jerk spread over various blogs/youtube/facebook/whatnot.
The only ones actually profiting from the discord this causes are the elites themselves. Makes you wonder, doesn't it...