You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoSpricyHotDog ago

But why 5-6 years later? After the story was pulled/unveiled. Unless there was evidence that she was going to release some previously unknown information related to PG/Saville - I don't get why she would have been UKilled off this late in the game?

Votescam ago

Very likely that she would have continued her research and investigation .... and either had new details to add or more discovery to report.

She would have continued fighting the censorship of the story on Saville and whatever else she knew about it and worldwide pedophilia -- what we can pretty much call "Rule by MKULTRA/Monarch."

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Source? Or just an assumption? It seemed like she had moved on... but, it would be incredible to find out otherwise.

Votescam ago

A summing up of who Liz Mac Kean was --

A journalist who had higher ethics than the BBC and resigned to protest the censorship of her story on Saville.

And those who worked with her made that clear ....

"remarkably tenacious and resourceful reporter".

"In Northern Ireland, she won the trust of all sides and produced some of the most insightful and hard-hitting reporting of the conflict," he said.

"It was as an investigative reporter that she really shone, shining a light on issues from the dumping of toxic waste off the African coast to Jimmy Savile, the story for which she is probably best known.">

Also --

'I was very unhappy the story didn't run because I felt we had spoken to people who collectively deserved to be heard and they weren't heard and I thought that that was a failure.'

The reporter also added that she felt 'responsible' towards the victims and felt she had let them down.

The Saville story serves as one of the guideposts for international pedo-gate, or maybe even one of the cornerstones . . . but no one begins with the Saville story and then ends their research/investigation there.