Too bad all the source linked stuff gets flushed down the memory hole and the scraps take over the front page. These types of rehash discussions might acquainte those with the gist of it and help others see what they hadnt noticed before which might help keep this sucker alive. I appreciate the rules and your service manning the wall tho, sure it takes up some time. Do think that the structure of the verse should be reevaluated. If I get an idea for improvement, I'll let you know.
All that is required is links to the subjects mentioned in the thread and if they are PG relevant, we leave it up. At that point this becomes a research post into what redpilled people. 😉 Shill-Shackling rules satisfied, discussion welcome to unfold.
Totes get it V. But these types of pieces provoke (and those that need provoking wld never make it to whatever). Don't have better idea. We really are deep within the annals of the free speech question here since, yeah, it'd be a pollock verse w/o guidelines.
I agree...and am totally willing to help users craft a post that satisfies the guidelines and allows them to initiate a discussion. Sometimes, that means making a weather balloon post about the topic with links summarizing what has been posted already, mentioning the desire for discussion and describing personal experience. Then the discussion can continue in the comments. It's not that hard to do, once people let go of their expectation to get on v/pizzagate and say whatever without adhering to the submission rules.
Please pass on to all and sundry that folks are welcome to DM me a draft of their post if they'd like advice on how to mold it into a guideline-satisfying one. :-)
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@VaultsofTesla: Unsorted discussion posts belong in v/pizzagatewhatever. v/pizzagate is for source-linked research posts only. Removing per Rule 2. Sorry.
SterlingJB ago
Too bad all the source linked stuff gets flushed down the memory hole and the scraps take over the front page. These types of rehash discussions might acquainte those with the gist of it and help others see what they hadnt noticed before which might help keep this sucker alive. I appreciate the rules and your service manning the wall tho, sure it takes up some time. Do think that the structure of the verse should be reevaluated. If I get an idea for improvement, I'll let you know.
Vindicator ago
All that is required is links to the subjects mentioned in the thread and if they are PG relevant, we leave it up. At that point this becomes a research post into what redpilled people. 😉 Shill-Shackling rules satisfied, discussion welcome to unfold.
SterlingJB ago
Totes get it V. But these types of pieces provoke (and those that need provoking wld never make it to whatever). Don't have better idea. We really are deep within the annals of the free speech question here since, yeah, it'd be a pollock verse w/o guidelines.
Vindicator ago
I agree...and am totally willing to help users craft a post that satisfies the guidelines and allows them to initiate a discussion. Sometimes, that means making a weather balloon post about the topic with links summarizing what has been posted already, mentioning the desire for discussion and describing personal experience. Then the discussion can continue in the comments. It's not that hard to do, once people let go of their expectation to get on v/pizzagate and say whatever without adhering to the submission rules.
Please pass on to all and sundry that folks are welcome to DM me a draft of their post if they'd like advice on how to mold it into a guideline-satisfying one. :-)