You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BIGLY17 ago

Very strategically written.

I honestly think a response of some sort will likely come; probably more of a "We are aware of these allegations and are working on bringing it to a resolution...blah blah..."

In terms of the legalities I don't think they have a leg to stand on but if anyone could find a means to end this in court it would be Disney. Their legal team is the epitome of the term 'Game Over'....for better or worse...

Raps1 ago

It's certain they have an army of lawyers protecting intellectual property and have long been aware of these videos, yet have chosen to turn a blind eye to them. I would suspect OPs inquiry will go unaddressed.

If enough pressure were brought to bear, I'm sure they would act, but the real question is why they've chosen not to. Somewhere, someone is creating these videos at great cost with, presumably, assurance there won't be a threat of litigation.

bezzy ago

At great cost? Am I thinking of the same thing? What I am aware of, the spidey and elsa shit as lampooned by H3H3, looks extremely low budget.

Raps1 ago

Thinking? Obviously not too deeply. Over a hundred videos featuring, claymation, costumes (ever price renting a single costume?), "actors", decorated sets, and available in multiple languages. Let's also not discount the army of bots behind the productions which rate, subscribe and comment on the videos. It may be a shit-tier botnet, but hop on over to blackhatworld.com and see what it would cost you to have someone code and maintain an ongoing promotion like that for you.

The production may be shit, but the sheer magnitude requires more than a single person. This is a very large operation and even the ancillary costs would be quite high.

angry_mob ago

you have to ask yourself how many people it takes to pull off an operation like that. i came to the same conclusion with the people gang stalking me for 10 fucking yrs! i thought, this is not a one man job.

bezzy ago

Good points.

BIGLY17 ago

^I concur - had not looked at it like that before you wrote that out