One reason this is getting almost MSM attention is the source of the article, The Nation.
The Nation magazine has been around a long time. It has deep credibility with the left as well as more centrist human beings. It only publishes it's well reasoned articles, after very careful analysis, the urgent daily news, isn't their focus. That good people exist across all political spectrum's, this is a reality both sides of any conflict ought to accept.
Pizzagate and Trumps unstoppable advance opened my eyes to the right. I stand up whenever I can now for the alt.right among my mostly leftest friends. It's real people, many of whom have the same search for truth and righteousness that I know exists on the left. No political side has a hold on all that's good or bad. We statistically reflect our parents views, it's rather simple.
So back to the magazine, it's a big deal when The Nation writes about it.
They are saying, the data got moved too fast for internet download, It was done at thumb-drive speed. Moving data to Romania would be particularly slow.
And secondly, the Guciffer 2 stuff was faked and after the fact. It was cobbled together and then made to look like Russians did it beforehand. The "meta data" makes this obvious to any qualified observer. I'm clueless on meta data, ...except that serious expertise stands behind that statement. .
All the individuals in the group making these extraordinary statements of fact, are carefully vetted in the article. People on Voat asking for present NSA / CIA employees to come forward, are asking for the impossible. Only those currently retired are allowed to speak, as these top level former NSA and CIA employees have been doing for about a year. They recognized the danger of the "the Russians did it" psyop scenario being advanced immediately after the Wikileaks release and began to warn us then.
view the rest of the comments →
SavedbyJCfromRSA_MK ago
One reason this is getting almost MSM attention is the source of the article, The Nation.
The Nation magazine has been around a long time. It has deep credibility with the left as well as more centrist human beings. It only publishes it's well reasoned articles, after very careful analysis, the urgent daily news, isn't their focus. That good people exist across all political spectrum's, this is a reality both sides of any conflict ought to accept.
Pizzagate and Trumps unstoppable advance opened my eyes to the right. I stand up whenever I can now for the alt.right among my mostly leftest friends. It's real people, many of whom have the same search for truth and righteousness that I know exists on the left. No political side has a hold on all that's good or bad. We statistically reflect our parents views, it's rather simple.
So back to the magazine, it's a big deal when The Nation writes about it.
They are saying, the data got moved too fast for internet download, It was done at thumb-drive speed. Moving data to Romania would be particularly slow.
And secondly, the Guciffer 2 stuff was faked and after the fact. It was cobbled together and then made to look like Russians did it beforehand. The "meta data" makes this obvious to any qualified observer. I'm clueless on meta data, ...except that serious expertise stands behind that statement. .
All the individuals in the group making these extraordinary statements of fact, are carefully vetted in the article. People on Voat asking for present NSA / CIA employees to come forward, are asking for the impossible. Only those currently retired are allowed to speak, as these top level former NSA and CIA employees have been doing for about a year. They recognized the danger of the "the Russians did it" psyop scenario being advanced immediately after the Wikileaks release and began to warn us then.