I'm still not convinced. I think it's possible they want us to think they secretly gave us the info on purpose, so we could run around chasing our tails, then come to the conclusion it's a psyop and ditch this year's worth of investigation.
But why give us so much info that will lead us to their legit crimes? Why would the Clinton's agree to make themselves look even more guilty than that which they truly are? Just for the purpose of discrediting us for believing in a crazy conspiracy? If they hadn't provided the information to begin with, we wouldn't have know about it, so what would be the purpose in this scenario?
Seems possible in theory, but when you put it into play in real life, I don't see where thats a good move. Unless the people above her chose to sacrifice her (not in the physical sense).
But believing this, means we also believe assange was either a) knowingly complicit and willing to throw away all his credibility, or b) was duped just like the rest of us.
Summary: I think calling pizzagate a psyop is a psyop
However, you want to talk the same shit about Seth rich, I'll listen. How did this story come back into light the second time around? Not saying, yet, that he's not real, just saying too many conflicting accounts and coincidences. It's almost like 3 bad authors trying to write a story together.
view the rest of the comments →
EllaMinnow ago
I'm still not convinced. I think it's possible they want us to think they secretly gave us the info on purpose, so we could run around chasing our tails, then come to the conclusion it's a psyop and ditch this year's worth of investigation.
But why give us so much info that will lead us to their legit crimes? Why would the Clinton's agree to make themselves look even more guilty than that which they truly are? Just for the purpose of discrediting us for believing in a crazy conspiracy? If they hadn't provided the information to begin with, we wouldn't have know about it, so what would be the purpose in this scenario?
Seems possible in theory, but when you put it into play in real life, I don't see where thats a good move. Unless the people above her chose to sacrifice her (not in the physical sense).
But believing this, means we also believe assange was either a) knowingly complicit and willing to throw away all his credibility, or b) was duped just like the rest of us.
Summary: I think calling pizzagate a psyop is a psyop
EllaMinnow ago
However, you want to talk the same shit about Seth rich, I'll listen. How did this story come back into light the second time around? Not saying, yet, that he's not real, just saying too many conflicting accounts and coincidences. It's almost like 3 bad authors trying to write a story together.
hookednosedjoooo ago
Seth rich never died