http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/08/jerome-corsi-seth-rich-brennan-sanctioned-cia-hit/
Pizzagate related because of possible (I think probable) Seth Rich - WikiLeaks connection.
Also, the comments are worth a look too... Gateway Pundit allows pictures/memes etc. in comments section.
Ever since I found out John Brennan became a Wahabiist muslim, I find him to be Incredibly sketchy.
Also, I remember FBIanon, or similar, claimed that Jerome Corsi was the closest at the time to the truth of what's going on behind the curtain.
Thoughts? Seems like a John Brennan libel lawsuit should be forthcoming quickly, or???
view the rest of the comments →
SoberSecondThought ago
I agree FBI Anon is important, but not because he endorsed Jerome Corsi.
The essential thing is to listen to the audio of Seymour Hersh talking to Ed Butowsky, and to understand what Hersh is claiming to know, versus what he is speculating about. About the FBI report and evidence that Seth Rich contacted Wikileaks, Hersh says, "I have someone on the inside who will go and read a file for me." This is about as good as it gets in our world. It's one degree of separation. Hersh then goes on about Brennan, and NSA head Rogers, and how they're liars and morons and so on, but he doesn't actually claim any definite knowledge that Brennan had Seth Rich killed. The single big reveal on the audio tape is that someone Sy Hersh knows and trusts confirmed that the FBI report linked Seth Rich to Wikileaks.
Why does this matter? Consider two things. First, when Hersh says "I have someone on the inside," he is telling the story in a way that plays up his journalism, his vast network of contacts, his prestige. Which is all perfectly normal, but then we have to ask why that person is willing to take serious risks for Hersh. What is their actual motivation? It can't be just to stroke the ego of Seymour Hersh.
Second point, again about what Hersh would know or not know. Seymour Hersh is an old-school reporter, with no particular allegiance to right or left. He has been around since the Vietnam War. I see nothing to suggest that he is techno-savvy; he doesn't have a blog, for example. So I think he would be absolutely unaware of FBI Anon or basically anything relating to 4chan. Why does this matter? Because I think Hersh's source may be FBI Anon.
This is basically Occam's Razor and not multiplying entities beyond what is needed. We believe in FBI Anon because his/her predictions came true, and the Vince Foster documents were put up on the FBI website at the appointed time. Personally, I believe that Hersh does have someone high level at the FBI who passes him information. Now, what are the odds that there are TWO high-level people at the FBI, working in complete independence from one another, to leak damaging information about the Clintons? It's simpler to assume that this is the same person. (Bear in mind that I regard all the other supposed insiders since the original FBI Anon as LARPers. I'm willing to take the word of Hersh that his source is real, and that makes this the first time that Occam's Razor has been needed.)
They don't seem to have made this connection on /pol/ yet. The media have gone very quiet on Hersh, and of course they never had any interest in, or appreciation for, the FBI Anon episode. They won't make the connection. I believe that what we are seeing, in this Sy Hersh episode, is another move in the chess game being played by FBI Anon. He didn't just come to 4chan. He went to Hersh as well, and probably went other places that will become known over time.
It's insanely dangerous for him, and I'm not altogether sure that I'm helping by putting 2 + 2 together in this way. But I think there are people on the other side who have had their knives out for FBI Anon for a long time, and I prefer to err on the side of helping him than do nothing.
Thoughts?