I appreciate open discussions. I think hearing as many sides to an issue as you can is very important to coming to an understanding about a topic. What I don't like about this post is how it feels like its dissuading research altogether through the use of name calling.
Why not just state the reasons for disbelieving in the topic and then let people discuss it. Instead OP ends it by insulting anyone with an opposing view.
I see topics duscussed here and on other boards regarding logistic routes, and possible places people are being trafficked and exploited something solid. Nearly every thread someone has to add the whole adrenochome meme. It looks like an attempt to discredit, something the msm can jump on and say PG researchers get their facts from a fictional movie. Really it sounds really dumb to someone with basic knowledge of organic chemistry that has read all research from likes of shulgin, mckenna, oswald etc . Yeah I oppose the view because its wrong and people pushing it are poorly read, or just shills.
Honestly I haven't seen Adrenochrome mentioned here until I came across your post. You could be right, I'm not on here 24/7, but that's just what I've seen. The only other time I ever heard of it in my life was through the movie Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
Either way, your approach at the discussion leaves something to be desired. As a researcher, I hold plenty of personal bias's, but I never want to be told not to investigate something. That just makes me want to look at it more. Get what I'm saying?
view the rest of the comments →
pby1000 ago
Your last sentence makes me suspicious. It is not the attitude of an open minded researcher.
None of the studies involve getting adrenochrome directly from the source.
Shillfest2017 ago
I appreciate open discussions. I think hearing as many sides to an issue as you can is very important to coming to an understanding about a topic. What I don't like about this post is how it feels like its dissuading research altogether through the use of name calling.
Why not just state the reasons for disbelieving in the topic and then let people discuss it. Instead OP ends it by insulting anyone with an opposing view.
slickleg64 ago
I see topics duscussed here and on other boards regarding logistic routes, and possible places people are being trafficked and exploited something solid. Nearly every thread someone has to add the whole adrenochome meme. It looks like an attempt to discredit, something the msm can jump on and say PG researchers get their facts from a fictional movie. Really it sounds really dumb to someone with basic knowledge of organic chemistry that has read all research from likes of shulgin, mckenna, oswald etc . Yeah I oppose the view because its wrong and people pushing it are poorly read, or just shills.
Shillfest2017 ago
Honestly I haven't seen Adrenochrome mentioned here until I came across your post. You could be right, I'm not on here 24/7, but that's just what I've seen. The only other time I ever heard of it in my life was through the movie Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
Either way, your approach at the discussion leaves something to be desired. As a researcher, I hold plenty of personal bias's, but I never want to be told not to investigate something. That just makes me want to look at it more. Get what I'm saying?
pby1000 ago
Agreed.
Tazcatlipoca ago
This