You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kestrel9 ago

They actively invite sponsors to visit their children in foreign countries

After telling one person about child trafficking and charities/orphanages etc. they relayed a story told to them by a person who had sponsored a child in another country for 9 years (from birth). They (it was a couple) decided it would be nice to meet the boy and have him stay with them. They contacted the charity to arrange it, but they were taken off guard that the 9 year old boy was sent alone on the airplane and didn't speak any English. Fortunately for the kid they were legit sponsors but it's disturbing to think how easy child trafficking could happen by evil people setting up bogus charity fronts and having pedophile customers 'sponsors'.

Factfinder2 ago

It's hard to believe that was legal, even when done by a legit organization. I hope they at the very least required a background check on the couple--not that those are very reliable given the number of pedophiles we see being cleared to work around children these days. Do you know or can you find out which organization was involved?

kestrel9 ago

Next time I see that person I'll ask if they remember the name of the charity. Since the couple had been sending money for 9 years, had correspondence, and it was a Church related support, perhaps it didn't occur to the charity. It was more disturbing to the couple that the charity would let the child fly unaccompanied, not knowing the language. It's odd, did they assume the boy would have a chaperon?

Factfinder2 ago

The thing is, even if the couple was trusted because of their long-term commitment and church connection, it can't be legal to just ship a child to unrelated people in another country with no charity-associated chaperone. If it is legal, the laws are completely inadequate. Pedophiles often spend years grooming intended targets, so long-term commitment most definitely does not equal safety.

kestrel9 ago

I don't know the situation about the legality, but as far as the implications you're correct, and as we know, most 'orphans' are not even true orphans, some are lured away from parents, or outright abducted and sold to orphanages. And certainly Church connections are NOT by any stretch, infallible proof of safety.