Except that through a simple Google search several sites have already discussed it AND the fact that the website the story was sourced from makes up 1/2 truth news articles. It's like posting an Onion article and demanding that someone prove it wrong. However, since Justin Bieber is such a nobody and ALL of the people in the church don't know who he is, I'm sure nobody had a cell phone handy to record anything. Oh wait, the Biebs is a huge celebrity, everybody in the church knows who he is, and ALL of the people there probably had cell phones. Isn't it interesting that Biebs himself nor anyone in attendance mention it? And why did the Biebs claim a different reason for cancelling the tour?
Discussion isn't proof, and arguing the website is unreliable is a logical fallacy called an ad hominem. It's different from the Onion becuase the Onion describes itself as a satirical source. Typically people don't use their cellphones to make recordings in churches. It's relevant that nobody else has mentioned it, but it's also relevant that others have made statements like "refused to speak out for fear of wrecking his career".
Out of curiosity, did you read the article? Did you notice in the article they never sited a source for the Bieber info?
Again, the website is well known for making up outlandish articles. You may as well argue that the Onion is real as well. It's just as factually inaccurate and you're obviously very gullible.
Yes, I read that. Like I said, the Onion doesn't pretend to be anything but satire, and they are worlds apart in terms of accuracy. Obviously you're just another idiot who can't cope with being shown to be wrong.
LOL So you're confident they are a legitimate news site and all of the articles on their sites are factually accurate? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE answer yes. Because that's what you're insinuating. And just so you know, I'm asking for a VERY specific reason.
So answer with either yes they are a legitimate news site or no they are not.
HarveyKlinger not that I have looked at anything in this link yet, HOWEVER, to your point no 1. 'Not a single reputable source reported it'. Pray tell me any 'reputable source' that is reporting ANYTHING pizzagate related? We have uncovered tonnes of circumstantial evidence yet no 'reputable source' has announced any of it. @Samsquamch
The website that first reported it is a news site like the Onion. The fact that nobody seems to recognize that is kind of sad. Until audio/video is released OR a non-Onion website picks up on it, it should be assumed it's bullshit. But as I pointed out, Bierber explained in full detail why he cancelled the tour - this wasn't it. In fact, since this is such a HUGE deal to him according to this article, is there ANY mention of anything related on JB's twitter or snapchat or facebook or... ???
My point was, and I am not even on about this case, just that just because it is not reported on MSM or something does not make it untrue. There are 100's of things they are not reporting on. I am just saying, again, I was not referring to JB.
view the rest of the comments →
HarveyKlinger ago
Proven a bullshit story already.
UglyTruth ago
And we should just take your word for it, right? Bieber is right in the middle of that scene and he is connected to the HillSong Church.
HarveyKlinger ago
Find me ANY source that isn't similar to the Onion.
UglyTruth ago
Why would I want to do that? You are the one making the claim.
HarveyKlinger ago
What claim? That the Biebs didn't say it or the fact that the source of that came from a bullshit news site?
UglyTruth ago
You said: "Proven a bullshit story already", but you have no proof.
HarveyKlinger ago
Except that through a simple Google search several sites have already discussed it AND the fact that the website the story was sourced from makes up 1/2 truth news articles. It's like posting an Onion article and demanding that someone prove it wrong. However, since Justin Bieber is such a nobody and ALL of the people in the church don't know who he is, I'm sure nobody had a cell phone handy to record anything. Oh wait, the Biebs is a huge celebrity, everybody in the church knows who he is, and ALL of the people there probably had cell phones. Isn't it interesting that Biebs himself nor anyone in attendance mention it? And why did the Biebs claim a different reason for cancelling the tour?
Here, educate yourself: http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/sean-adltabatabai-on-being-in-the-eye-of-the-fake-news-storm-a3468361.html
UglyTruth ago
Discussion isn't proof, and arguing the website is unreliable is a logical fallacy called an ad hominem. It's different from the Onion becuase the Onion describes itself as a satirical source. Typically people don't use their cellphones to make recordings in churches. It's relevant that nobody else has mentioned it, but it's also relevant that others have made statements like "refused to speak out for fear of wrecking his career".
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836062/Bombshell-documentary-Hollywood-pedophile-ring-preying-child-actors-s-linked-X-Men-director-Bryan-Singer-premiers-New-York.html
HarveyKlinger ago
Out of curiosity, did you read the article? Did you notice in the article they never sited a source for the Bieber info?
Again, the website is well known for making up outlandish articles. You may as well argue that the Onion is real as well. It's just as factually inaccurate and you're obviously very gullible.
UglyTruth ago
Yes, I read that. Like I said, the Onion doesn't pretend to be anything but satire, and they are worlds apart in terms of accuracy. Obviously you're just another idiot who can't cope with being shown to be wrong.
HarveyKlinger ago
LOL So you're confident they are a legitimate news site and all of the articles on their sites are factually accurate? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE answer yes. Because that's what you're insinuating. And just so you know, I'm asking for a VERY specific reason.
So answer with either yes they are a legitimate news site or no they are not.
Samsquamch ago
I don't doubt it, but got a link proving it bullshit?
HarveyKlinger ago
TrishaUK ago
HarveyKlinger not that I have looked at anything in this link yet, HOWEVER, to your point no 1. 'Not a single reputable source reported it'. Pray tell me any 'reputable source' that is reporting ANYTHING pizzagate related? We have uncovered tonnes of circumstantial evidence yet no 'reputable source' has announced any of it. @Samsquamch
HarveyKlinger ago
The website that first reported it is a news site like the Onion. The fact that nobody seems to recognize that is kind of sad. Until audio/video is released OR a non-Onion website picks up on it, it should be assumed it's bullshit. But as I pointed out, Bierber explained in full detail why he cancelled the tour - this wasn't it. In fact, since this is such a HUGE deal to him according to this article, is there ANY mention of anything related on JB's twitter or snapchat or facebook or... ???
TrishaUK ago
My point was, and I am not even on about this case, just that just because it is not reported on MSM or something does not make it untrue. There are 100's of things they are not reporting on. I am just saying, again, I was not referring to JB.
Samsquamch ago
I still don't believe OP's story is true, but I was hoping you had something more concrete when you said:
I guess the verdict is still out.
HarveyKlinger ago
The fact that the "source" is yournewswire.com should be enough. Here are some other "credible" articles on their front page:
Britney Spears: ‘Prince William Is Not Human’
Hollywood Insider: Bill Cosby Was Framed By Elite To Stop Him Buying NBC
and my current favorite:
Expert: Organic ‘Robotoids’ Are Real And Have Infiltrated U.S. Politics