In an earlier post about the Clinton email which talks of gathering 100 orphans from the streets, a comment was made about why the number was 100? So I did a search on 100 orphans and quite a few results showed up. I don't know that there is anything suspicious about them, other than the first one which is for "Beautiful Together" which uses a logo with a small hand inside larger hands.
here is the one with the suspicious logo.
https://beautifultogether.org/project/feed-clothe-shelter-100-aleppo-orphans/
We are working to immediately provide 100 Aleppo Orphans
and a second
http://chrismarlow.me/2009/11/untitled-6/#
HELP Feed 100 Orphans
In Uncategorized by Chris MarlowNovember 23, 2009
And a third:
https://cafo.org/2010/11/22/100-orphan-sunday-reports/
November 22, 2010 by Jedd Medefind
100 Orphan Sunday Reports
And a fourth, although this site does mention other numbers of orphans that they have helped in different ways and it has a 200 orphanages title
https://200orphanages.wordpress.com/
The Projects That Love Built.
March 29, 2017 in
Your love bought 100 orphans in India a bus
And another which has 58 orphans, but also 100
http://www.saveorphansministries.com/webapp/p/203/get-involved
30/month helps an HIV/AIDS orphan at at our care center-currently we have 58 of them.
b. $150/year pays for school for one orphan-currently we are sponsoring 100 orphans in schools
Does this mean anything? Could the number 100 be a code word? or is it just a standard recommended goal?
view the rest of the comments →
DeanKeyhote ago
LOL! Its probably what we call a nice round number not meant to be taken literally.
In haiti 100 became (prosecuted as) 33, an actual significant number.
Freemasons derive their rituals from jewish kabbalah, acknowledged fact. No points for guessing why these elite jews propogate "transgenderism" either....because its kabbalah.
Commoner ago
Well, if anybody would know, I thought you might . Maybe they ask for 100, so they can have their pick of 33.
Or, it may be more of a scam number.
DeanKeyhote ago
You could be right dude but you post some quality shit, if only we had some FOCUS.
example: everyone agrees modern art is a big part of PG because of its elite nature, but if we look at say the trustees of MOMA in NYC or LACMA in LA we find mostly Jews from beginning to end (chronologically).
It is not NOBLE to overlook the Jewish angle here. Its actually quite embarrassing and pretentious: "thats simplistic, not all jews, blah blah my cunt itches"
Seems like people here wanna stop PG UNLESS it requires them to swallow their pride. Shame!
Have any of you even given a thought to how bad you will look IF you failed to act on the obvious? Not you personally btw.
Commoner ago
I hear what you are saying, but you can't convict a group of people based on their name, ancestry, or beliefs.
DeanKeyhote ago
....aaaand youre a fag again, LOL. I cant even describe the level of cringe.
So if HYPOTHETICALLY you could and had to deport every single Jew and then PG was over, you wouldnt? Youd say nah thats unfair to the innocent ones? I would go voluntarily!
Do you even see how cucked you are?
I bet think every illegal laborer in America deserves to have his family come too, otherwise we "tear apart families".
You think men before Mexicans havent had to work elsewhere and send money back to their families? FUCK THEIR FAMILIES DUDE AND FUCK MEXICO! JEWS HAVE IMPORTED 1/3 OF MEXICO HERE TO UNDERMINE WHITES' POLITICAL POWER AND NOW CALIFORNIA IS BANKRUPT.
FUCK THE KIKES. FUCK THE SPICS. AND FUCK YOU FOR BEING A NAIVE RACE-TRAITOR BRO.
Commoner ago
They couldn't convict OJ
They couldn't convict Casey Anthony
They won't keep radical muslims out of the country.
They call you racist if you want to secure the border.
But yet you think connecting everyone that is Jewish into one guilty party is going to end this.
Seriously?
Tell me one court or judge or jury that would .
Just being 'right' doesn't get the job done.