Long time listener of Michael Savage. I feel like, regardless of what you think of his opinions, he's generally well-informed. On 8-01, he mentioned "fake news" stories. He's been silent on pizzagate since it came out, glaringly so, in fact. But he finally mentioned it and totally mischatacterizrd it as a story about "Hillary and Podesta running a prostitute ring out of a pizza joint in D.C." Even the smallest amount of homework tells you that this is not at ALL what PG is about. So what gives? Smells fishy to me. Did he bring it up as "fake" to get the word out? Or is he a damn shill? (No Jew-bashing please.) he's generally very, very unbiased (left or right) in his anti-big-govt stance - throws the right under the bus as much as the left, anti UN, etc. his position makes zero sense, esp given a few hints/snide remarks he's made about Podesta insinuating about his proclivities. As though he knew the story and believed it. Feels like a weird game to me. Thoughts? Here's the link to the podcasts. 8-01-17 around the 8:40 mark (later as well): http://conservativestream.com/recorded-shows/savage.php
view the rest of the comments →
Cheetos1 ago
I generally like MS's attitude toward most topics, but he does have glaring flaws. I stopped listening to him for a long time after he came out against Edward Snowden with extreme vitriol. He seems willfully ignorant to common privacy concerns and unwilling to address some of the biggest conspiracies in US history (JFK, 9/11, Gulf of Tonken, etc) so its no surprise that he comes out against PG without any cursory discussion with his listeners.
I was listening to the same program the other day when he did this. He brought up PG out of no where and without any context. He also blasted anyone giving credence to the Seth Rich/DNC murder conspiracy. It's really a paradox that is quite frustrating to see. With such a big audience he has the potential to draw so much attention to these events. Perhaps he is a shill or perhaps it is just a generational thing, idk.
I do find that older americans are harder to accept the redpill. I generally think that people have so much of their lives invested in s paradigm of how the world operates and resist any redpills because the acceptance of which calls into question the context of most of their lives. To accept the redpill is to admit that large foundations of their life were false and they were naive to believe it. By the time you are 60+ years old thats a large foundation and most egos will not subject to it to questioning and possible erosion.
I still listen to MS because he is entertaining and is correct on many things (Islam, culture, borders, etc.); but I listen to him knowing that he will never cross into discussion that threatens the entire system. Virtually no one is permitted to discuss such topics to such a large audience; maybe he knows this, idk.
GeorgeHodelDidit ago
Yes....this is it. I had a hard time when I finally realized America wasnt noble and trying to save the Planet....we were just the big dumb mule of the Luciferian Sabbetean Masonic Kazars.....
That we were killing millions of muslims for no real reason except to make their countries a horror show and drive young men and kids into Europe. To cause chaos so no one can know what is happening to the people. To dominate the native Europeans with foreigners.
That Vietnam was a fake as war....that we tricked Saddam Hussein into invading Kuwait....Saddam always said the American Ambassador gave him the go ahead to invade. I could not believe we would kill 3000 of our own citizens.....
But I could not deny it any longer. It was painful. Our whole history is a fucking lie. Hundreds of thousands of American men have died for elite jackasses to make money and play a real version of the game risk. They are making the wars so bad the world cries out for peace at any cost. They are basically psycopaths and need to be isolate or eliminated from society for all our safety.