Wow. This guy is sitting on a powderkeg of incriminating evidence. You can't blame him for not naming names, but if I were him, I don't think I could live with simply not watching films with children. He says the police are in on it--true, I'm sure. This is the big problem for anyone in his position: Who to trust with your evidence? We need to find a truly safe way for witnesses to come forward.
By the way, what this guy is saying really rings true. For instance, he says women run the child procuring operations. This matches exactly the testimony of a Southern California victim who came forward on David Zublicks' You Tube channel. Her story was discussed in this Voat thread: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1947336/9591182
What evidence? Sounds anecdotal at best. Yeah he has some names of people who may have had incriminating things on their computers 15-25 years ago but it's an entirely different era of technology where you can download a VPN as easily as you can a web browser and infinitely more ways to cover your tracks for such things now exist which i'm sure are shared within such a circle. Unless there's something I missed. Edit: Not sure why all the downvotes but courts of law in the USA don't convict on a "he said, she said" basis it's just not how the judicial system works and never will. Kind of an issue with this problem is people get far too emotional and many completely throw logic and reasoning out the window.
I don't know whether he has any physical evidence such as pictures, etc., but he definitely has eyewitness testimony of his interactions with potential perpetrators. People told him they were doing illegal things with children. They invited him to join in.
Fantastic. I always thought you were all delusional low info morons, but now we have an eye witness testimony. When are the warrants going to be issued?
Hang on wouldn't ole, def attempted to abduct someones word be he said she said? In fact don't we have 2 alleged victims and an eye witness accusing Trump?
If i'm not mistaken the mods decided that Trump thread was possible disinfo. Is that pure hypocrisy or par for the course round these free speech parts?
view the rest of the comments →
Factfinder2 ago
Wow. This guy is sitting on a powderkeg of incriminating evidence. You can't blame him for not naming names, but if I were him, I don't think I could live with simply not watching films with children. He says the police are in on it--true, I'm sure. This is the big problem for anyone in his position: Who to trust with your evidence? We need to find a truly safe way for witnesses to come forward.
By the way, what this guy is saying really rings true. For instance, he says women run the child procuring operations. This matches exactly the testimony of a Southern California victim who came forward on David Zublicks' You Tube channel. Her story was discussed in this Voat thread: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1947336/9591182
Onetime1 ago
Ghislaine Maxwell was Epstein's procurer.
juugCity ago
What evidence? Sounds anecdotal at best. Yeah he has some names of people who may have had incriminating things on their computers 15-25 years ago but it's an entirely different era of technology where you can download a VPN as easily as you can a web browser and infinitely more ways to cover your tracks for such things now exist which i'm sure are shared within such a circle. Unless there's something I missed. Edit: Not sure why all the downvotes but courts of law in the USA don't convict on a "he said, she said" basis it's just not how the judicial system works and never will. Kind of an issue with this problem is people get far too emotional and many completely throw logic and reasoning out the window.
Factfinder2 ago
I don't know whether he has any physical evidence such as pictures, etc., but he definitely has eyewitness testimony of his interactions with potential perpetrators. People told him they were doing illegal things with children. They invited him to join in.
Chan4cp ago
Fantastic. I always thought you were all delusional low info morons, but now we have an eye witness testimony. When are the warrants going to be issued?
UglyTruth ago
You don't get to ask questions, 2 hour old dipshit.
spacewitch ago
The username is even more telling.
Chan4cp ago
Hang on wouldn't ole, def attempted to abduct someones word be he said she said? In fact don't we have 2 alleged victims and an eye witness accusing Trump?
If i'm not mistaken the mods decided that Trump thread was possible disinfo. Is that pure hypocrisy or par for the course round these free speech parts?