Haha. Total junk. That case was an election farce. Don't ya think the entire media hell bent on destroying the man would've used that against him if it had any merit?
this story may well be bunk, but i wouldn't rely on HRC not using it during the "selection" process as evidence of that fact. It really can't be disputed that Epstein ran some type of illegal operation out of his fla home and his island (the documents of his various court cases including one where he was let go with a slap on the wrist and i believe 1 felony conviction confirm this). Epstein is obviously "deeply" connected and protected. HRC (or Trump either---after all if this was b.s., it's not b.s. that Bill made numerous trips to the island even w incriminating phots--i think hrc was on the travel list too) wouldn't be free to bring up Epstein related claims. Also, the fact that trump only touched on some of the numerous condemning circumstances involving hillary, shows that these main stream candidates can't just spout off about whatever they want
new4now ago
Easy enough to coordinate stories after all this time. Or....
have victims change name of Clinton to Trump
Remember, they like to accuse people of things that they do
I believe this crap came out as a proactive move to draw away from true accusations of the Clintons
These people go through money like we go through toilet paper
They have a sick meaning of the phrase "The end justifies the means"
WhyAserverWasBuilt ago
Do ya think Trump would have trotted out Bill's rape victims if they had anything like this before on him! And not before he was sworn in? Ridiculous!
fatcocks ago
read and post and looked for the details - absolutely nothing at all. complete rubbish.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Mods get this lying BS off of here!
Millennial_Falcon ago
Can't remove just because we disagree, but I will flair it as possible disinfo.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Thank You
con77 ago
fukn liar
LeHappyMerchant ago
Haha. Total junk. That case was an election farce. Don't ya think the entire media hell bent on destroying the man would've used that against him if it had any merit?
We know Trump didn't like Epstein's tastes.
Jobew1 ago
this story may well be bunk, but i wouldn't rely on HRC not using it during the "selection" process as evidence of that fact. It really can't be disputed that Epstein ran some type of illegal operation out of his fla home and his island (the documents of his various court cases including one where he was let go with a slap on the wrist and i believe 1 felony conviction confirm this). Epstein is obviously "deeply" connected and protected. HRC (or Trump either---after all if this was b.s., it's not b.s. that Bill made numerous trips to the island even w incriminating phots--i think hrc was on the travel list too) wouldn't be free to bring up Epstein related claims. Also, the fact that trump only touched on some of the numerous condemning circumstances involving hillary, shows that these main stream candidates can't just spout off about whatever they want
RweSure ago
To be clear, this report is about a different woman who was mentioned in that case. He's claiming Jane Doe #2 came foward.
LeHappyMerchant ago
The source is a Clinton staffer ffs. I'm betting this "taped interview" will come to nothing. Total nonsense.
Phonesmin ago
We don't know shit.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Hey U Soros cocksucker, Go do to URself what Mooch said Bannon could do to himself! Then bend over and do it again!