Have you ever wondered why there was ONE SERVICE the Federal Government actually WANTED to privatize and passed a law to do so. That service is the Nat'l Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Have you ever wondered why there was ONE SERVICE the Federal Government actually WANTED to privatize and passed a law to do so. That service is the Nat'l Center for Missing and Exploited Children. (pizzagate)

submitted 7.7 years ago by Commoner

From their website:

Thirty-two years ago, police could enter information about stolen cars, stolen guns, even stolen horses into the FBI's crime database – but not stolen children. Several tragic cases began to awaken the nation to the problem that there was no coordinated national system for addressing missing children cases.

http://www.missingkids.com/History

If the FBI can track guns, cars and horses, why did the Federal Government chose NOT to track missing kids or child pornography crimes? Why leave that up to a private organization that has no requirement by law to be transparent with regards to who its donors are or the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act)

I know many are suspicious of NCMEC. Honeybee has done serious research, and this previous voat post has a good summary of the reasons for such suspicion. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1723445

So, I had to ask myself if the FBI can track cars, guns and horses, why would they chose NOT to track missing kids? Why would the federal government, which wants to control everything from healthcare to education to the internet, chose NOT to control the center for missing children and the collection of child pornography evidence? Why is that the one service they enacted a law to privatize? And how can a private organization be allowed to do something illegal like store child pornography?

No wonder why Trump said that human trafficking is worse than it has ever been in history. Most likely our federal government had a hand in sanctioning it.

61 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

IShallNotFear 7.7 years ago

Normally, I'm for privatizing industries. However, this monopoly of the missing kids organization seems worse than being under government control. Not only do they have no competition, they have no direct oversight by the elected officials.

link

Votescam 7.7 years ago

Why would a "people's" government operating in the interests of the public and using taxpayer money want to privatize any service the government requires?

Save money? You can't ADD a profit line to any business without increasing the costs.

Plus -- when you privatize an industry the public loses control and accountability of that industry. Like with Charter Schools.

Note that what our Founders actually did with the Constitution was to create an Elite Patriarchy, endowed it with land grants, gave them immense influence and control over our people's government, the nation's wealth and natural resources. We were "set up" for private control of the nation long ago by the Founders.

link

turitelle 7.7 years ago

For sure. Costs of everything that's been privatized around here has gone way up and service way down. They cut corners, staff and wages so they can make a big profit and they don't give a hoot for doing a good job. Roadwork, hospital cleaning, care homes and more all gone to hell in a handbasket. The private contracts all went to the big donors of the government crooks who privatized too, go figure.

link

Votescam 7.7 years ago

Agree - And there are actual lives being lost in the lack of care and very poor care which Americans are getting.

But it is laughable when they suggest that "privatizing" will save money. How do you save money by adding a profit margin?

link

BlueDrache 7.7 years ago

Your charter school analogy is flawed. Every metric has privatized schools (parochial especially, but charter as well) out performing public schools by light years ... until niggers and vouchers are put into the equation.

link

Votescam 7.7 years ago

That's false as Charter schools -- which, btw are not "private" in the sense that they are financed by US taxpayer money, while they are unaccountable to the American taxpayer -- are constantly failing.

Charter School Failures and Scandals Occur Nearly Every Day https://networkforpubliceducation.org/2017/01/charter-school-failures-scandals-occur-nearly-every-day/

And everyone is reporting those failures -- not only the schools but 40% of the children not meeting state requirements for graduation -- and a long list of other problems which can be seen here ... as reported by NY Times, Huffington Post, Fortune Magazine

https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=charter+school+failures+in+US&fr=ush-mailn&fr2=p%3Aml%2Cm%3Asb

Plus religious schools are not Charter schools which were a new avenue intended to destroy public education for the masses.

Rather Catholic schools are also failing as parents have moved their children into public schools. And as Americans have moved away from male-supremacist religions. However, Catholic schools have also long tried to attract as much government funding as they can, actually against our Constitutional mandate for separation of church and state.

And, I would say that your comment here ....

until niggers and vouchers are put into the equation.

makes abundantly clear what you and the reasoning behind Charter schools are all about.

"Speak so we may know you."

link