You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Infopractical ago

The calls for information in the comments are reasonable. If this is a murder, it is also true that anti-Clinton forces failed to create a network of support and information and the result is a lack of any credible information chain. Say it ain't so! I hope that if Eberwein was planning to testify against the Clintons that we will get a credible report as such. In the meantime, there is substantial evidence that the Clinton Foundation screwed Haiti. Real information. But even that isn't getting media coverage (and that's part of the reason Trump won). Hopefully the waters are not being muddied with an untrue story, but to many of us...we aren't sure yet.

Infopractical ago

A good principle we should all try to follow: Never give Snopes an easy win. If Snopes has an easy win, we should be able to reasonably assume it was the result of misinformation/shilling.

Plant_Boy ago

In the sense of giving Snopes a hard time, they declared he was depressed and working as a uber driver.

Yet he was a business owner, a governmental official, and in good spirits to his friends. Was he about to open a new business in Miami? How could his mood turn sour? He argued about the Clinton foundation stealing Haitian money and Trump was in power, which should keep him positive. What motive did he have for being depressed and committing suicide?

DeathTooMasons ago

You would think people would be suspicious that snopes presumes to have the answer to every issue on this planet. The site was run by two flakes, an obese woman and a stripper obsessed geek. But present them anything from a story on the CIA to an article about a Tibetan leader and these two godlike creatures can give a true or false answer every time. It's hillarious that this never occurs to the average sheeple.

Plant_Boy ago

Is their argument invalid? What is the counter proof?